Stream Movie The Test & The Art of Thinking

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary
Director	Michael Arlen Davis
Country	USA
Also Known As	The Test and The Art of Thinking
Runtime	1H 25M

Wednesday, 21 Oct 2020 03:13

Excellent film, great style. I will give the director credit, and the cinematographer credit, for bringing the movie to life. The most interesting thing in this movie is the relationship between the director and the photographer. The director, clearly not knowing how to tell a story, can still create an important piece of art. I know many people who have taken off work to go to this movie, and some who were actually depressed after the movie was over. It's great that we don't need the entertainment value of a film to do something meaningful. This movie had so much going on that it didn't get time to do anything. I recommend this movie to everyone, and if you are feeling depressed you should see this movie. I am a little hesitant about this being a documentary, but it doesn't matter. It shows the negative side of working in advertising, but it doesn't really show the positive side, which is what makes this so powerful.

Monday, 19 Oct 2020 00:54

When I heard that this movie had won a Oscar, I was extremely excited. I had seen the movie twice in a cinema, and this time I got a chance to go on a web cam interview with the director. I got to talk to Christopher Nolan and discuss his vision, his work, and his love of cinema. But as I said, I have never seen the movie again. I was able to see the trailer once again and I watched the movie again, so I was able to remember everything. And I thought the movie was much better than I thought it would be. The movie was much more "realistic". It was better written, better written. It was even more interesting, more "realistic". So this is why I was able to give this movie a 9 out of 10, but then again, I have never seen the movie again. So I give it a 9 out of 10, because this movie was much more interesting than I thought it would be, and I definitely recommend it to everybody.

Wednesday, 14 Oct 2020 10:58

I loved this film. It was done really well and presented the ideas and ideas in a non-biased way. It's not a documentary on the subject and certainly not about anyone of the subjects involved, just a film about them. The documentary is about everyday people, their struggle with their brains and their love of the mind. I am sure that this documentary will not appeal to the average movie goer, but it will appeal to the science-minded and will show a point of view that most of us share. It's also fun to see the various opinions about the test - some people think it's useless, others love it and some think it's terrible. In the end the debate over the test and the rest of the subject is one of passion and debate and how we view ourselves. I enjoyed this film and would recommend it to anyone who is curious about the subject and is open to the idea that it is an exercise in consciousness.

Monday, 12 Oct 2020 08:39

It's that kind of movie that makes you feel good. One of the most honest views on mental illness ever made. That it exists in all forms. I was very impressed by the director and all the producers in the first half of the movie. Then it started to get a little slow. It was almost all about the relatives and all the emotions they were feeling about what had happened to their loved one. Just a bit too many movies about mental illness. Most of them were preachy. Many of them were just made up. But then again you might get the feeling that the movie really is making you think. I do, even though my opinion is not really that important. It really does make you feel. The most important thing is the integrity of the movie. It's a really well made movie. It has the honesty to the point where you really feel sorry for the people. They are obviously very sad and broken. But the movie also made me think. I want to be able to help people like them. It's a very powerful movie. I've seen a lot of bad ones lately, and this one is different. It makes you feel good about yourself.

Tuesday, 06 Oct 2020 01:55

This is the second of the Documentary "Thinking" series. There were 4 documentaries in the first series: "Red Flags", "The Public Enemy", "Flash Boys" and "The Firestorm". The first movie had a brilliant view of the US. Here we see a little more of the work of the TSA and how they can infiltrate a country in 5 minutes without getting a single ticket checked. Here, there's just one ticket checked to see if the suspect has a computer or cell phone. It's a "filter" from a 7.5 billion dollar airport. They have to have "follow the blue line" security procedures at airports. I was astonished at how they can just write "Follow the blue line" on a ticket and give them an extra screen. It's really ludicrous. And, just think about the screener. How did they find that out? This is beyond stupid. To add insult to injury, they knew they weren't going to check any cell phones or computers. It's so outrageous. How does that security procedure not give them an incentive to check the computer and cell phones of everyone to make sure they're secure. But, they make it their mission to build a massive airport, and they do it so effectively. Now, it's really a clear cut case of TSA and Homeland Security competing for profit at the expense of the American people. They need to start holding the TSA accountable to serve the American public. This is a must see. It was well edited and informative, even if it did have some repetition from previous movies, such as the before mentioned "Red Flags". I highly recommend it. A must see for anyone who loves America, like me.

Monday, 14 Sep 2020 08:35

I thought this documentary was brilliant. I did like the way it was put together - a lot of raw footage, without breaking it down to information. As I watched I didn't feel that I was missing any of the details. I was glad to hear the reflections of the other actors, and to see some interesting connections made between a handful of them and how they relate to the subjects. I loved the way they pulled together some of the different facets of the subject matter, to help me understand more about it. And I was glad to see so much interest on the subject. As a 'scientist' I think the issues that are addressed here are really important. It is clear that the film makers are not going to be able to get everything that they want to. But at the same time, I'm glad that they were able to discuss things in a way that actually makes sense to most people. It's nice to have a film that you can look at and say, 'That's how I think about it' instead of having to think of what "science" thinks about it. Some of the subjects were dealt with in a very sophisticated way, and there are people that really understood the concepts. It was a bit too complicated, but it is what it is. It's been a very educational documentary for me.

Saturday, 12 Sep 2020 06:16

It was like a movie. You could tell that all the people in this movie wanted to share the pain of a person who has done something they feel is a mistake or selfish. The way they were speaking to each other was like they were explaining it to you as they were explaining it to you. There is something about this movie that makes you feel for these people. So, if you want to know what it feels like to live in a world where a lot of people don't have a good relationship with each other, I recommend watching this movie. You will understand why the people in the movie are doing what they do. It is not right. It is really unfortunate and not a good thing that this has happened in our society. But, maybe, we can learn from it. I believe we can. We can learn to be a better person and do more to help each other. So, do yourself a favor and watch this movie, because, it is a must.

Tuesday, 01 Sep 2020 19:28

I'm not a journalist, but I went to the theater with some friends who are. We wanted to see a documentary, not a sequel to "The Future" or "The Road" or "The New Wave" (the people who originally made these films). So we took the evening off from work and watched this. And while it wasn't an epic or anything, I enjoyed the first two parts and thought the third one was very good. I thought it was more about "how a robot could think", which is something I wanted to see in the first place. The ending seemed a bit too sudden and I think it was intended to be more about the nature of humanity than about what "scientists" want us to believe. But that's what this film is about, and there were a few moments when I was convinced I was watching a documentary. So if you like The New Wave, The Science of Thinking, or just want to learn more about some of the people who are involved, I would definitely recommend seeing it. And for the record, I don't think the majority of people would feel the same way I did. The film is far from perfect, but it's still a lot of fun to watch. 7/10

Friday, 28 Aug 2020 05:12

Cpt. James R. Maxwell, who spent most of the interview speaking about the heartwarming story of his son, when asked what his son "saved his life" at age 6 by speaking out against the Vietnam War. The question was the most poignant moment of the movie. Maxwell responded: "He's saved my life." (It has a sub-plot about how the son, Marvin, became a folk hero in the old country for speaking out against the war. He recalls how his son, a career Air Force officer, wrote and sold the book that provided the critical part of his story. Maxwell's character, Major James W. Hoad, who was writing the book and enlisting Marvin as a defense force role model, puts the force of his family through the absolute hardships of war with him. He has struggled to make ends meet and keep the house in order. His father used to take over when he got sick and was eventually replaced by Marvin, whose humor and energy has kept him going. When Maxwell and Marvin have seen each other recently, the bond is palpable. It is incredible to watch the impact of the son's life-giving speech on a fellow man who was born in 1946, and later went on to have a career as a Navy officer, and then a defense force recruiter, both in the ranks of petty officer and major. Marvin's role model book was featured in a PBS special. (The DVD edition is available for viewing in 2002.) All of us can relate to the question of whether war can make one a hero. Maxwell puts it this way: "You think you're saving the world, and you're not."

Wednesday, 26 Aug 2020 02:52

Forget the term docudrama. This is about the impossible, about the hopes of a young man who just wants to make a difference and how the system lets him down. This isn't an unsympathetic movie, nor an easy one. This isn't a "slapstick" film. This is the reality of this country. The real story is the ones like Anthony Hopkins. The story of another young man in Philadelphia who will help us understand our history and culture.

Wednesday, 19 Aug 2020 20:30

The goal of the New York Times series was to examine what it means to think, not necessarily how thinking works, but rather the effort that people make to think and the consequences of that effort. The video begins with the story of a university professor who lost his job, wife and his home to foreclosure, and had to rely on the social safety net of Social Security and unemployment benefits. One can only imagine the effect of such a situation on any person. "The Test and The Art of Thinking" tells the story of a woman named Mary Brown. Mary was a hypochondriac who experienced extreme anxiety, and who has had numerous strokes and cardiac arrest in the past. She lived in a state of extreme and disorientation, unable to recall much of her past. Mary could not write her name and it was impossible to find her phone. The result was that she developed a test for describing the first two steps of an illness, namely, "the first sign that the patient is ill is a red spot on the tongue," and she also developed the art of thinking. After being assigned to a psychiatric hospital, Mary learned to associate various conditions with disease symptoms and to differentiate between symptoms of depression and anxiety. Mary's IQ was so low that she could not recall the details of any patient she had ever met. Mary began to think more, even if she could not do the things she had been doing. She developed the skills to perform tasks that were normally difficult for her. Mary became a writer, in a series of articles for the New York Times, and she began to produce one of her articles every day. Mary also began to use other techniques for thinking, such as hypnosis, parapsychology and hypnotherapy. Mary is able to perform activities that are normally beyond the capacity of normal people, and she continues to learn new things and learn how to improve the skills she has acquired. Mary also experienced a great deal of social stigma in the past. Because of her illness, she was labeled an idiot and ridiculed. She was afraid to talk about her illness with her family. She was afraid to interact with her coworkers. She was afraid to leave the apartment she shared with her husband, and she was afraid to talk to her neighbors. She had trouble adjusting to her surroundings. Mary had been through a lot in her life. Yet, she began to use the skills she had learned, and she became more and more productive. As the video states, "People often think that when they get sick, their lives are somehow more meaningful. But that's not the case. There are no lessons in sickness. There are only lessons in recovery." The video concludes with Mary and several other hypochondriacs and hypnotherapists talking about their experiences and how they had overcome their limitations. They concluded that "thinking makes you smarter."

Monday, 17 Aug 2020 18:24

You should watch this film because it does what the Oscar should be doing, it brings the whole situation to light, showing the failures and the successes in some detail. It's a small contribution to an excellent documentary. I was in awe at the magnitude of this problem. The choice of acting in a doc is no small feat, but Celine is as good as she has ever been. It's a shame that there aren't more documentaries on the subject of gay people and the way they are perceived. That would be one of the things that would make the problem of gay people so pervasive.

Saturday, 15 Aug 2020 06:13

The test is one of the oldest and most basic skills that all of us must know and practice. By starting with the basics, it is very easy to learn to think and to think critically. The test helps you to think about any question that comes up on your test; it's not just about memorizing the questions and answering them correctly. It is also an amazing tool to help you think through and actually practice the test. If you would like to learn more about the test, I highly recommend the book "The Art of Thinking" by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. This book is a great resource for anyone, but especially for students of psychology. Each chapter is filled with lots of useful and interesting information about human behavior, and the principles that help you to understand and apply the test as well as help you learn how to think about questions on the test. This is one of the best books on the test, if not the best. See this book for free. The Art of Thinking is a must read for all who want to be a better thinker. 10/10

Thursday, 13 Aug 2020 03:54

One of the things I learned in college was that the biggest purpose of a documentary is to encourage people to think, to be inspired, and to learn more about themselves. This documentary addresses exactly what I learned in college and it does it with grace and beauty. It also does a great job of introducing us to the young women who were involved in the process. It's a story of a movement and the beautiful movement of change that it inspired. However, the documentary goes on much longer than it should. I think this could have been made into a short film, but instead it wraps up at about 45 minutes. But still, it is a great documentary. There is a lot of historical context about the book and this documentary explains it perfectly. It also really helps you see how this book influenced some people's ideas of religion, and it provides some powerful examples of how the book changed the way people thought and the way they lived their lives. The only problem is that some of the documentary goes on long enough to just get to the point. But all in all, I highly recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in religion, science, or just learning about it.

Tuesday, 11 Aug 2020 11:40

A large, well-staged play that is staged during the '70s and '80s in what seems to be the backwoods of North Carolina. In one shot, the camera follows a lady through a field, and another follows a girl up a hill. The story is told with no music, and there are no special effects. However, it is well acted and includes a surprisingly deep and sensitive reading of the life of William Blake, written by Marcus King. This film is well-made and fairly well-known. The theater where I saw it was full. I found it engaging and enthralling.

Tuesday, 11 Aug 2020 02:09

My first review of any film, and I feel I should be pretty brief, as I think this film deserves a much higher rating than it has. The whole point of the film is that they focus on the various ways that the mind works, from the physical to the metaphysical. To illustrate, we have videos of people trying to be as abstract as possible and their ability to do so is spectacularly showcased. The video on their website has people doing everything from writing poetry to drawing on the walls to simply becoming completely passive and even enjoying the mental process as a way to escape from reality. They show various different types of visualization of different kinds, including visualizing a blank page, one being drawn on the wall, or just doing things as they would be happening in the world, like going to the bathroom. The videos are so spectacular, I can't even make them up! We also have interviews with people who have different different approaches to thinking. One is an engineer who says that they simply think to the most efficient way they can think about something. The other is a neuroscientist who says that they use their brain as a kind of a calculator, using it to evaluate and calculate their own actions. Some people think that they can visualize a person walking on a train in their mind, and even say that they can visualize a person jumping in front of a moving train, or a person jumping into a moving train. I personally found this the most interesting, as it seems like the more abstract the thoughts, the more often people use their mind in a different way. Another thing that is shown in the videos is that people have various different ideas about the world around them. One is that you can think about the world in black and white, but in reality, all the colors are part of our world, and so it's also very possible to think of a person driving a car through the trees, and suddenly, the trees are red. Another person is able to visualize something different in his mind, like thinking about a different planet that he thinks is Venus. Another video shows a scientist describing how different people think differently, and how the brain processes different ideas in different ways. The more abstract the thought, the more often people use their brain in a different way. To give you an example of this, this scientist says that we are able to think of colors as having different kinds of meaning. He says that we think of the color red in the same way as we think of other colors, because when we see a red, we can immediately know that it has a different meaning to it. I was thinking about this a lot when I watched the film, and as a result, I felt like I was able to get a better understanding of what it means to think differently. The end of the film is about some of the other theories of the mind, and how they all tie together in a very interesting way. I was really touched by it, and I hope that others can get the same feeling I did, and also understand what I mean. Overall, I enjoyed the film, and I think it's one of the best I have ever seen. It really seems to be about people who do a lot of different types of thinking, and it is also about how the mind works, and how different people think about the world around them. The fact that they are all different in different ways, it seems like it would be hard to make a connection between all of them, but it's also very possible. I really recommend this film, and I really hope that others will also enjoy it.

Wednesday, 05 Aug 2020 04:56

This is a great, raw, great film, with really good stuff to say about, and a great mix of psychology, theory, anecdotes, and revelations. I was interested in this film, but it was a bit of a let down. There's not enough dialogue, not enough thinking, and some of the stuff the movie shows you are not the most significant, because there's no argumentative, they don't get the point. It just seems like the director was on autopilot and didn't know how to write a compelling story. This is a great movie, but it's too linear and linear in it's storytelling. The pacing of the movie is a little odd, and it's hard to follow. I'm sure it's a great film, but I was disappointed with it.

Tuesday, 04 Aug 2020 19:25

The worst way to spend a few hours. If you've got a brain, and you're not just like me, then I think this is a really good idea. It'll get you thinking, you won't have to worry about anything for the rest of the day, or for a week. You'll need to be creative. This could be a great place to start. There are a lot of great stuff in this documentary, but the majority of it is just us looking in on the 3 guys working on their latest film, one of them is talking about his work, and a lot of the rest is us asking questions about this topic. The music in this documentary is pretty good too. Some really good stuff. It's a great documentary if you're bored.

Monday, 03 Aug 2020 02:36

As an undergraduate student of philosophy, I find myself in the same position as the narrator of this film. On one hand, I would say that this film, "The Art of Thinking", can be a great source for the young people in this country to learn more about the nature of thinking. However, I believe that the time frame that the narrator used to provide his story, in the form of the first half of the 20th century, was too brief for a complete picture to be created. The rest of the film felt like it could have been condensed to something more manageable, but I think that it would have been more valuable to get the whole story across. All in all, I think that this film could have been more informative, if it had been longer, or had been more detailed.

Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 12:41

What I liked about this documentary was the great acting talent. When it comes to the scientific method, I think it's a bit more cerebral than most of the other documentaries on it. It's the way it is. The test is a very powerful tool. I think a lot of people think that it's only used for diagnosing schizophrenia. But it's not. I think the use of the test is to show people that they need to be able to think on their own and not just follow rules. This is something that I think is very important. And to make people think differently is something I think people can get. I think the documentary is very powerful because it gets people to think differently about something they didn't know they needed to think about.

Wednesday, 29 Jul 2020 02:49

In 1987, comedian Andy Kaufman faked his own death and walked into an abandoned mental institution to tell everyone that he was dead. Even though the true story behind this prank has been the subject of a number of documentaries, it is still a fascinating story to this day. While Kaufman died, all of his family and friends went through one of the most traumatic and painful experiences of their lives. All of the footage that was used in the documentary is now available for viewing and a true testament to the man's gift of making people laugh. This is a truly unique documentary and is a must see for all fans of Andy Kaufman.

Monday, 29 Jun 2020 19:49

This film was truly a great documentary about a subject I like, and also one that was so misunderstood that it was easy to put down those who could be considered the main character of the movie, Bruce Lee. The only problem was that the film was not all that good. The first problem was the fact that the documentary focused too much on Bruce Lee. The second was that the film did not make much use of the wonderful archive footage that Lee used to make his films. What you get here is a mixture of interviews and the director's own recollections. It was interesting to hear about his methods, but there were a few points where the director seemed to gloss over them. There was one interview where he described the filming of the beginning of The Story of Drunken Master. It was interesting to hear how he got his footage, but that was it. There were several other interview clips from other documentaries that you would be better off watching, like The Making of Enter the Dragon. I also think that the fact that the film was made in such a short time limit meant that it didn't do the subject justice. Lee is not just a martial arts genius. He is a brilliant actor and a brilliant writer, a gifted scientist and an author. But he is not just a martial artist. In fact, this is a great documentary for anyone interested in Bruce Lee, the martial arts or his life. Just don't let the title fool you.

Wednesday, 17 Jun 2020 17:08

I think it is absolutely brilliant. How can anyone not enjoy this film? It was so good! It was touching, interesting, amusing and thought-provoking. The two main characters, Simon and Julianne, had such great chemistry. I found myself watching the movie all the way through at various points. The plot was brilliant. I was curious to know how it would end. I was not disappointed. I can't recommend this movie highly enough. If you haven't seen it already, then go now. This movie is one that you should watch!

Wednesday, 29 Apr 2020 20:30

I am not familiar with Tarkovsky's works, but I think that this film, which takes its title from his first and most important film, The Test, is a well-made, accurate portrayal of a man's personal struggles in the face of near-catastrophic events. The Test chronicles the early days of Tarkovsky's career as a film-maker, starting with his film The Last Picture Show, which was a model for what he would eventually make. The film covers the years between 1936 and 1937, but it's really the later years that hold the film together, particularly the year 1936. There is a discussion of the following year's movie, The Last Picture Show 2, which was a huge flop, but had a positive reception among the Russian audience. After Tarkovsky's big failure, he took a break from filmmaking, focusing on teaching art to the students at a university. There he met both Maria, the younger of his two daughters, and Vladimir, the eldest of his three daughters. In the film, we see how these two different ways of life interact. After several years, Tarkovsky returned to the movies, doing not just film, but also painting, and performing in various theatrical and philosophical performances. We see the real-life struggle of those two men in the face of the difficulties they faced. The Test is very much a personal documentary, with Tarkovsky himself narrating most of the movie. The film does not cover every aspect of his life, but it does cover his wife, his children, and the numerous people who are related to him through his work and his artistic activity. This documentary may be not be the most important documentary out there, but it is a well-made one, and it is the best of its kind. Recommended for people who are interested in Tarkovsky's life.

Watch Online The Test & The Art of Thinking

Product details

Download documentary «The Test & The Art of Thinking»

Customers who watched «The Test & The Art of Thinking» also watched

24 customer reviews about «The Test & The Art of Thinking»

Top reviews