x

SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(247) 5.9 97 min 2019

Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer is a movie starring Carl Bernstein, Tony Brenna, and Maggie Haberman. 'Scandalous' is the sensational true story of The National Enquirer, the infamous tabloid with a prescient...

Starring: Tony Brenna, Maggie Haberman, Carl Bernstein, Generoso Pope Jr.

Genres: Documentary

Director: Mark Landsman

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Documentary
Director	Mark Landsman
Stars	Tony Brenna, Maggie Haberman, Carl Bernstein, Generoso Pope Jr.
Country	USA
Also Known As	Scandalous: The True Story of the National Enquirer, Skandalozno: Neispričana priča Nacionalnog Enquirer-a
Runtime	1H 37M
Description	'Scandalous' is the sensational true story of The National Enquirer, the infamous tabloid with a prescient grasp of its readers' darkest curiosities.

Download documentary «Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer»

Blu-ray
13.5 GB

Customers who watched «Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer» also watched

19 customer reviews about «Scandalous: The Untold Story of the National Enquirer»

2.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Sunday, 08 Nov 2020 04:06

I am a HUGE Enquirer fan, and this documentary was a great addition to my Enquirer collection. It was a good look at the publication's decline from its glory days of the 1970s to its current decline to the point that it has become more of a tabloid newspaper, than a news organization. I thought the interviews with former Enquirer reporters were great, especially with the ones that covered the war in Iraq. I think they have a lot to learn from the people who were there in the 1970s and early 1980s. I think that this documentary is great for people who like history, and people who are interested in the world of news media. I would say that it is a good starting point for people to learn more about Enquirer. It is a great documentary that should be enjoyed by anyone who enjoys history and news media.

Tuesday, 03 Nov 2020 23:41

This film is a fascinating, comprehensive look at the Enquirer's history and its impact on the lives of the magazine's staff, contributors and subscribers. I would recommend it to anyone who loves to learn more about a news source. A must see.

Friday, 09 Oct 2020 01:44

I saw this movie on TV, and was able to watch it on a home-video, and I must say I enjoyed it immensely. I was not prepared for the level of "uncensored" footage that this movie provided. This documentary is very interesting and informative. It provides a fascinating look into how the Enquirer came into existence. I enjoyed this film immensely and I recommend it to anyone who is interested in the world of tabloid journalism.

Sunday, 04 Oct 2020 21:19

The National Enquirer has never been a positive influence on my life, but this documentary does a wonderful job of exposing the dark side of a tabloid and making it out to be a positive thing. The documentary covers the history of the magazine and its history of trash and sex, but also covers how the magazine has changed over the years and how it is still relevant today. It also goes into the personal life of the magazine's founder, Joseph Pulitzer. The documentary covers all of the negatives and positive aspects of the magazine, and does an excellent job of making the audience think about the "news" they see on the newsstands. There is also a lot of humor in the documentary, and it is a refreshing change to see a documentary that doesn't focus on the negative sides of a publication, but focuses on the positive aspects. I highly recommend this documentary to anyone who loves a good documentary. I give it a B+.

Friday, 04 Sep 2020 18:56

This is an intriguing documentary, in which the National Enquirer, the tabloid news magazine, gives the account of the most explosive story in the history of the United States. This story, which we know was the inspiration for The Usual Suspects, involves a scorned ex-girlfriend of a celebrity, whose name is never mentioned in the film, and a tabloid newspaper who was told to "get a life" by the star, who in turn was advised to have an affair with the reporter. In the film, the journalist is accompanied by his editor, who is appalled by the affair. The journalist has to deal with the press, and the tabloid, which makes it difficult for him to continue with his investigation. In the end, the tabloid reporter is forced to deal with the tabloid, and it becomes clear that the affair was the catalyst for his downfall. The film is extremely well made. It is interesting to watch the investigative process, with the star and the tabloid, as well as the editor and the journalist. It also provides a great look at the relationship between the tabloids and the press. I really liked this documentary, because it was so well done. I recommend this film to anyone who enjoys a good documentary, because it is well made.

Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 09:14

This is a very well-done documentary about the National Enquirer. It is in the same vein as the similar documentary "The Black List" about the Black List, which is not a bad thing. But what makes this documentary stand out is that it is not just a look at the Enquirer's inner workings, but also the personalities who worked there. The documentary was made by a man who was a journalist for the Enquirer for many years and also served as its executive editor for many years. That's a pretty unique combination of talents and experience. So when you look at the "unexpected" results of a story, you can't help but look for the people who helped make it possible. If they are not in the documentary, you know they worked there. So it's an easy way to look at the National Enquirer and see what it was like to work there and how it shaped the culture of the paper. As a journalist, I really liked this documentary because it shows the enmity between the Enquirer and the "Black List." It was a dark time for the paper and the people who worked there. The relationship between the Enquirer and the Black List was not a friendly one. It was a battle of egos. The Enquirer wanted to write a hit piece about the Black List and the Black List wanted to stop them from writing a hit piece. So there were a lot of people who disagreed with each other and you can see the animosity in the work of the Enquirer. The documentary shows the source of that animosity and how it was at the heart of the Enquirer's reporting. I also liked the fact that the documentary does not paint the Enquirer as just a tabloid newspaper. I think a lot of people would expect a documentary to paint a picture of the Enquirer as just another tabloid newspaper. But the documentary does a good job at showing that the Enquirer was also a great source of information and investigative reporting. So it was a shame that the film was not also about the National Enquirer. In the end, I think it's a good documentary because it shows how the Enquirer has changed over the years and the reason why I think it's important to look at what happened when the Enquirer was at the top of the tabloid world. The National Enquirer was at the top of the tabloid world in the 1930s and 1940s and then fell quickly. It wasn't the only newspaper to do this. Newspapers like The New York Times and The Washington Post, to name a few, also had tabloid properties. The National Enquirer was the top of the list and it was falling down fast.

Thursday, 20 Aug 2020 17:38

This is an interesting documentary about the National Enquirer. While some of the episodes may be predictable, there are some truly interesting stories and people in the film. The documentary is certainly worth watching. However, it is not enough to make this a good movie. It is quite slow and there is not enough action to keep you interested. However, the film does get better as it goes on. The first half is very slow and boring. However, the film starts to pick up a bit in the second half. The first half is the best part of the film. However, the second half is the weakest part. It is quite hard to sit through the second half. The documentaries does not have the impact it should have. It does not have enough action and the documentaries do not have enough suspense. However, it is still worth watching.

Tuesday, 18 Aug 2020 18:43

I was really impressed with this documentary. I was in high school when it was being filmed, and I was really shocked at how the story was portrayed in the media. I thought it was very well done, and I think it's an important film. I don't think I've ever seen a documentary that made me feel so much like I was in high school. I think this documentary is a great tool for educating the public on the importance of good journalism and the importance of honesty and integrity. It's great to see how the media can be so corrupt, and how they can use the media to their advantage, and how the media can be used to manipulate the public. I think the media has a lot to answer for, and I hope this documentary gives people an idea of how they can become more aware of this issue.

Thursday, 06 Aug 2020 02:04

As a film student, I really enjoyed this film, even though it did not completely explain the story of The National Enquirer. I think this film is great because it presents a realistic and honest view of the tabloid news industry. The people in the movie did a great job, and I think it is very important that people know that it is not easy to get access to the National Enquirer, but also that it is a great job. The producers and directors were very professional in how they presented the story and the way that they portrayed the media. I also think that it is important that people know that there are people who do not like what they see on the news, and that they also like the people who are in it. I think that this film was very accurate, and the way that it was presented was very interesting. Overall, I think that this is a very important documentary about the National Enquirer and it's relationship to the news media. The documentary also shows the importance of reporting the news, but also shows how important the National Enquirer is and how it is different from other news outlets. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in the National Enquirer.

Monday, 03 Aug 2020 23:45

This documentary explores the National Enquirer, the tabloid magazine known for sensational stories, and its parent company, Life magazine. The company has a history of covering celebrities' personal lives. But it was the publisher's brother, William Randolph Hearst, who ran the magazine and the sensational stories. In this documentary, reporter Brian Williams follows the rise and fall of the tabloid and the magazine's parent company, which is now defunct. Williams has a knack for interviewing interesting people, and he shares the story of his interview with Hearst, and his discovery of the magazine. The documentary is a good look at the rise and fall of the magazine and the parent company.

Tuesday, 28 Jul 2020 06:51

In 1981, the National Enquirer, a tabloid magazine that called itself "America's #1 Dog-Loving Magazine", put out a big scoop about a dog that died of cancer. The man behind the story was Scott White, who became the man behind the Enquirer. What started as a hobby soon became a career, and he started the magazine. Today, the magazine is published in about 5,000 newspapers, and is in the top five newspapers in America. The film was based on the real life, and the documentary is based on the real life of Scott White. It shows that the story of the dog was not as sensational as the magazine claimed. The real story of the Enquirer is much more sensational, and they made the film to make it more dramatic. The film was well made, and shows a very good interview with Scott White. I recommend this film for anyone who is interested in the real life of the Enquirer.

Victoria Rogers

Monday, 20 Jul 2020 01:51

I was looking for a film to watch with my husband and we were not disappointed. I was a bit skeptical of the film because it is so controversial, but it really is a very good film. It's very entertaining and it's definitely worth seeing. I think that if you are a fan of the National Enquirer, you should really watch this film. It is really a good documentary about the National Enquirer. It's not a documentary about the Enquirer. The film is very interesting and it's really a good film.

Sunday, 28 Jun 2020 04:28

The National Enquirer is a tabloid that's a sensational, oftentimes lurid tabloid. It is generally a tabloid with a negative spin, particularly in the 1980s. It's the voice of the "Enquirer" and it is portrayed as the voice of reason in the media. However, it's not always that way. The movie begins by detailing the origins of the Enquirer and how it came into being. This is pretty interesting and I thought that was an important part of the movie. But the part that I found most interesting was the interview with reporter Joseph Curl who talks about how he felt being a reporter, there's something about the reporters being able to say what they want, being able to say whatever they want. He talks about that and he talks about how he feels like an outsider, not really getting on the same page with other journalists. He talks about how he feels like a reporter and the journalist's job is to be able to get people's attention. This is a fascinating interview and it was one that I enjoyed. However, I felt that the movie was a little slow at times. I felt that the interviews didn't really follow the narrative of the story as well as the movie was really pretty quiet. It's not that it's bad, I felt like it was just a little slow at times. But I felt like it could have used a bit more energy at times. The movie does a pretty good job of setting the stage and the story, but it did feel like it was a little too slow. However, it's worth a watch if you're a fan of the Enquirer. The movie has a few nice moments and it's worth a watch, but it's not really worth a full length watch. It's a pretty decent movie that's worth a watch.

Friday, 12 Jun 2020 05:15

This movie is a good history lesson about the National Enquirer. I thought it was interesting to see the movie as a biographical film, especially since I had a friend who worked at the Enquirer for years. I thought the movie was well done, and very informative. I was also glad to learn that they have moved on and gotten a new website. I was also glad that they were able to get the current stories on the website. I think they have a very good collection of stories. I think the biggest disappointment was that they didn't tell us more about the people involved. I think it would have been better if they showed more of the story, but I understand that it was a biopic and it had to be as close to the truth as possible. If you like history, you will like this movie.

Wednesday, 10 Jun 2020 18:57

Based on the book by Tony Ortega, this film does a good job of giving the story of the Enquirer as it was when it first came to life. As it turns out, it wasn't a very good story at all. There were many flaws in the story, but I thought that the acting of the two actresses who played the lead actresses was very good. I especially liked that they portrayed their characters as not trying to be something that they weren't, but instead as people who were normal. In fact, they seemed like normal people. The documentary doesn't make much of the Enquirer's financial troubles, but I think that it could have been made more interesting if they had focused on it more. There was a lot of talk about how "anti-Semitic" the Enquirer was, but I don't think that it really was that anti-Semitic. I think that the movie made it seem like that the Enquirer was all about making money. The idea that the Enquirer would go to such great lengths to get their stories published, was definitely a stretch. What the movie did very well was show how the Enquirer's stories got into print. It showed how the stories were often changed by people in the media and how the stories were actually going to be printed in the Enquirer's paper. The movie was very informative, and I would recommend it to anyone who likes the Enquirer. It was very informative and you wouldn't want to miss any of the interviewees. It was a very good movie that I would recommend to anyone.

Monday, 04 May 2020 13:42

I am a student of the American Revolution and I am proud to be an American. This documentary was extremely well done. The fact that it was based on real people who actually had a hand in the war is amazing. I would recommend this documentary to anyone. It is a must see for anyone who has ever been a part of the American Revolution. The documentary does a great job of showing the hard work and dedication of the men who were willing to go to battle and risked their lives to bring freedom to America. It is a great documentary to show people about the American Revolution and the true story of the National Enquirer.

Saturday, 02 May 2020 17:13

I found this movie to be one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. It really gets to you and shows you what the Enquirer really does. The stories are very well done and are very interesting. It really shows you the kind of people they are and the kind of stories they tell. They are very negative and very disgusting. The interviews with the people they interview are very interesting. They tell you stories about what they are really like. They talk about the ways they are being attacked by the media and how they try to defend themselves. It's very interesting and they really show you the kind of people they are and the kind of stories they tell. It's really a very good documentary. It really gets to you and it shows you what the Enquirer really does.

Saturday, 25 Apr 2020 01:02

This documentary is very informative and well presented. I did not think it was boring, as many other documentaries have been. The two main characters, David and Helen, are well portrayed. They seem like real people who are committed to doing the right thing. It is not a documentary about them but about their family. I think it is very important to show the people behind the Enquirer. They are a lot more interesting and interesting than the journalists themselves. They are responsible for their actions, and it is good that they have admitted their mistakes. It is good to know that the Enquirer is just a side business of a man who is guilty of some very serious crimes. David is a very funny and funny guy. He is probably one of the most creative and funny people I have ever met. Helen is the complete opposite. She is a complete idiot. I think it is important to know what really happened at the Enquirer. I think it is very important to know how the Enquirer has become what it is today. It is an example of how people can go to extreme lengths to make money. It is a very sad and sad story and I think it is a very important story to tell.

Friday, 24 Apr 2020 11:19

This documentary was very interesting. There was not much new information in it. It was mostly from the past and the present. But the part that was new was the part of how the National Enquirer became what it is today. This documentary showed how they became the most famous tabloid in the world. It's kind of like a time capsule for today. The first thing that I noticed was the fact that there were multiple takes of each interview. I mean they were multiple takes of each interview. It was like they were just recording and recording again. There were many clips of different interviews from other people. I'm assuming that they were taking the footage in order to do a book on the Enquirer. It's kind of like a how-to guide to the Enquirer. I would recommend this documentary to anyone who likes to learn about the Enquirer.

See all 19 reviews

Write a review