SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Le jeune Ahmed

(2108) 6.5 90 min 2019

Le jeune Ahmed is a movie starring Idir Ben Addi, Olivier Bonnaud, and Myriem Akheddiou. A Belgian teenager hatches a plot to kill his teacher after embracing an extremist interpretation of the Quran.

Starring
Olivier Bonnaud, Myriem Akheddiou, Idir Ben Addi, Victoria Bluck
Genres
Drama
Director
Luc Dardenne, Jean-Pierre Dardenne

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles 日本語  Čeština  Português  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres Drama
Director Luc Dardenne, Jean-Pierre Dardenne
Writer Jean-Pierre Dardenne, Luc Dardenne
Stars Olivier Bonnaud, Myriem Akheddiou, Idir Ben Addi, Victoria Bluck
Country France, Belgium
Also Known As その手に触れるまで, O Jovem Ahmed, El joven Ahmed, Ο νεαρός Άχμεντ, Young Ahmed, Ha'Bkhira, L'età giovane, Az ifjú Ahmed, Młody Ahmed, Unge Ahmed
Runtime 1H 30M
Description A Belgian teenager hatches a plot to kill his teacher after embracing an extremist interpretation of the Quran.

Top reviews

Monday, 25 Jan 2021 17:41

In the country of Senegal there was a film festival of 2002, but its opening day went well with the opening of the film, "Mayday" by George W Bush (a film which makes it big at the festival). For this reason I was very much curious to see what "Mayday" was all about. The story is about the consequences of an oil spill which is threatening the country, while George W Bush is serving his term as President of the United States. The film is visually beautiful and the actors are wonderful. The most interesting and striking element of the film is the cinematography. There are so many layers to the film that it is impossible to summarize the plot and the entire movie. All you really need to know is that it is about a tragedy that affects an entire country and that it is affected by a huge environmental disaster. "Mayday" is not a movie which is meant to impress the audience, but to show the devastating effect that one disaster can have on a whole country. George W Bush is played by one of the greatest actors of his generation and he makes a tremendous job in portraying the President. He shows his differences from the usual presidential candidate (or any politician) in an extremely sincere way and he shows his leadership qualities by convincing the country of the need to do something to protect it's environment. The same can be said about his fellow actors. The rest of the cast, including George's wife Laura Bush, his daughters Jenna Bush and Barbara Bush and his son Donald Trump Jr. have not had much opportunity to act, but they have made a superb job with their characters. "Mayday" is a film that needs to be seen by everyone. It is one of the best movies of the year, and deserves to be seen by everyone.
Monday, 25 Jan 2021 08:10

I'm not sure what to make of this film, but it certainly is an interesting piece of work. I guess it's not what one would call a "family" film, but it is a pretty good family film. There are some interesting things about this film that I think have escaped many other film goers. I really do feel like the ending was really significant. It is important to note that this is the final film in the "Three Musketeers" series, but there is a connection with the films. The director of the film is Francois Truffaut, who was also the director of "The Three Musketeers" and "The Civil War". And while the trilogy may be a little confusing, it is nice to see that a filmmaker has decided to make a film out of it. There is some interesting language in the film, with Truffaut using a dialect of French that is a bit different than what is being spoken now. I also found it interesting that the villain in the film was called Danton. I think it is fitting because Danton was the second greatest military leader of the French Revolution. Danton was of noble blood and his whole family was connected to the wealthy classes. But in reality, it's not Danton we have to thank for the revolution. Napoleon was the one who got the idea for the revolution. We don't even really know if the three men were part of the revolution. In the film, we learn that they were just ordinary people, working as cannon-fodder. That's kind of interesting, and it makes the film more personal. You begin to feel for them, and you feel sorry for them. You feel sorry for the poor people in the country, and you sympathize with the French. It's nice to see the conflict between the nobility and the common people. I really like how this film is really different from the rest of the movies of its kind. The way they showed the French Revolution as a kind of international conflict is interesting, and it makes for a great contrast. They even managed to make the British and Americans into a great family film. There is one scene where the Americans are cooking dinner and they have some lovely food and drink. It is also nice to see some beautiful French countryside shots. Overall, this is a good film and I really recommend it. It is a good film to watch with your children. My daughter liked the film a lot, and it was nice to see it back in the days when I grew up in the 80s and 90s.
Wednesday, 09 Dec 2020 02:24

The film is written and directed by Robert Hardy and stars Jennifer Ehle and Johnny Depp. It's an adaptation of the best-selling novel by Andrew N. Martinez and is set in Detroit in the 1980's. It stars the brilliant actor Depp, who's perfect for the role, and Ehle, who plays Ahmed, who is a bored reporter at the Detroit Free Press. The film is an extremely well-made film and probably the best film of 2007. I will admit that the ending was a little confusing but that's the only reason I didn't give this a 10/10. The rest of the film was extremely well-done. The cinematography was great, the performances were good, and the movie was interesting and fun to watch. This movie was one of the best films of 2007. It's recommended by me. This is one of those films that you either love or you hate but I can definitely see why people don't like it. The acting was good and the acting was great. Johnny Depp and Jennifer Ehle do a great job as Ahmed and Tanisha Epps was also good but not as good as Epps. The story of the film is extremely strong and really shows how the rich have all the luck. Ahmed is a reporter at the Free Press and also runs the bar in the Free Press. The man who makes Ahmed a reporter is Richard Danvers (played by Johnny Depp). Danvers is in the film for over two hours and I really like how the character is written in the film. I also like how the character is different from the book. He is more of a "bad guy" but you actually see the hatred and anger in his character. Tanisha Epps is really good and the other characters in the film are really good. I would definitely recommend this film. It is definitely a must-see film. The cinematography and acting are excellent and it is a must-see film. This film was one of the best films of 2007. I highly recommend this film. Overall, I can't believe this film didn't get more attention. It was a fantastic film. It was fantastic and very good. This film is very good. This is a really good film. This is a very good film.
Thursday, 26 Nov 2020 03:25

The photojournalist and anti-war activist, Ahmed Mohammed, has been in the news for his own good. He has seen more than his fair share of adversity and grief. In the film, he tells the stories of his struggles with the injustice and injustices that he has faced. Ahmed's first and most prominent crime is that he was not at home in time for the wedding of his daughter's classmate. He is interrogated for days, held in solitary confinement, then abandoned and thrown out of the hospital. His courage is so great that he continues to go into the battlefield, risking his life in his battle with the Israeli government. In the film, Ahmed is able to overcome his situation and reach out to his daughter's friend to try to help her friend get to the wedding, which he is not able to attend. In the process, he goes through many hardships, such as being shot in the eye, being confined in solitary confinement, being harassed by the Israeli army, and being told by the Israeli government that he is no longer a legitimate Palestinian citizen. The picturejournalist's willingness to help and support his fellow Palestinian citizens is extraordinary. But Ahmed's most important moment comes after his ordeal ends, when he is allowed to meet his daughter's friend in the hospital, and they share a moment of emotional reunion, where he tells her that he loves her and that he is ready to move on. He then goes on to tell her that he is now a fully realized Palestinian citizen, that he is allowed to travel to his hometown and live in it, and that he is able to pursue a career in journalism. It is a powerful, moving, and inspiring film. It will be one that I will remember and want to see again. This film is truly a rare gem.
Monday, 09 Nov 2020 00:01

The film depicts the lives of the two brothers, Abdul and Ahmed, and their reaction to the Paris attacks, what happens to them on the day of the attacks, and how they all make their way to Syria to fight for the terrorists. The film doesn't offer any answers as to why they are fighting, or what motivates them, but it leaves you with a feeling of some responsibility toward the world. There are two main themes that play out in the film: Islam, and the problems with the group of brothers. In the beginning of the film, you see the brothers dressed in Islamic attire, and they talk about what they are doing and what they want to accomplish. At one point, the brother shows his father a video of the Islamic State flag. Later, he returns to the house to play with the new camera he purchased, and has a real conversation with his father, the brothers' father. In the midst of all of this, the brother is confronted with an episode of violence on his life, which in the end brings him back to his family and his friends, who are all Muslims. The film also shows a lot of symbolic messages and symbols in the way the brothers live their lives. For example, the brothers are well-educated, both in their Islamic studies, and their Muslim faith. They are in the process of being integrated into the mainstream Muslim community, but the battle they face is with those who still question the faith, as well as with those who hate the religion, and do not understand what it is to be Muslim. They are trying to explain the meaning of Islam to their parents, but to no avail. Finally, they are having a lot of problems with the United States, which they do not like. These problems may seem overwhelming to some, but you will see that the brothers do not seem to have many problems with their new lives in Syria. In a way, the film reminded me of the film, "The Thin Red Line," because there is a man, Dave, who has a mental illness, and is being tried in a military tribunal. He is fighting for his freedom and his sanity, but his new life is confusing. While "The Thin Red Line" is a fictional story about a soldier, it is the same in the film. In the film, you see Dave, and you think that you know his story, but in the film, you do not know anything about him. He was shot and killed in combat, and his death is not really shown, or you never see him shot. In the film, you do not know how he came to be in this situation. In the film, you also do not know how he got home. Finally, you do not know the message he was trying to send to his family. All of these things are very relevant and they make the film a very personal story, because the brother, Dave, does not know any of the things that have happened to his life. These are all questions you will need to think about when you see the film. Some of these things you can ask your friends about, and the best thing you can do is talk to someone you trust about them. This film is extremely important, because the messages it is trying to convey is the most important of all. Many of the messages that come out of the film are complex, and you need to know about the issues before you can make any conclusions. You should also watch the movie before you do anything, as you do not want to be in the situation the brothers are in. There are many videos and still images that are very powerful, and you need to be able to handle the power of these images. In the film, you also see some images that are very graphic, and you need to be able to handle them before you can make any conclusion. I would also recommend that you talk to someone about these issues. Even though you may not have heard anything about these issues before, it is important to listen to other people's opinions. You will need to make your own conclusions.
Tuesday, 27 Oct 2020 10:33

This is an excellent film. I've seen it twice and enjoyed it both times. It has been the subject of much debate over the years and the fact that it was made in 1973 is testament to the times that it was made. You can argue about what kind of message the film sends and who the actors were. Some argued that the subjects were even too old for their roles and that they had not developed their acting skills since they had been acting since they were teenagers. However, I don't think that that is the case and this is one of the best films of the 1970's that has been made. The actors are very good and the story is great. It is the subject of the film, Ahmed, who is not only brilliant but also very vulnerable and tragic. We have many opportunities to understand the depth of his love for her, but we never see it. There is always a feeling of longing, never really knowing what he would do if she did not come back, or what he would do when he found out. He does not even want to take her in to see his parents, his own parents who are not around and they are looking after their own daughter. The best way I can describe it is that the film is a meditation on life and how we all need love in our lives. In this film, we see how it is passed on from one generation to the next and how it is passed on through Ahmed's love and love for her. The film is dark, and the scenes are well shot. It has a beautiful art direction and amazing photography. The acting is very good. I've watched this film many times and it still moves me.
Tuesday, 15 Sep 2020 01:57

Fanny's story is a haunting tale of a young woman's plight when a family comes to town, but she is not allowed to live in the house. Inevitably, Fanny's story is the subject of much conversation in the movie. She is not only a character in the movie, she is also a character who the audience identifies with. The challenge for the director is to balance a family that is not what she has been told about as a child. The director of the movie does not sugar coat Fanny's story in any way. She is not some type of easy target for the filmmakers to push a message. Fanny is a realistic character who uses her own words as the foundation for her actions. We know that the family is not what we have been told, but that does not make Fanny any less of a woman. The director has chosen to show Fanny's journey through the first half of the movie in a slow pace, but the film reaches a peak in the final scenes. The director has depicted Fanny's story in a way that the audience feels as though they have become a part of the family and have a vested interest in Fanny's story. The director did not expect the audience to be swept up in the narrative and the audience would often be left with questions about what they have seen. In other words, the audience has to ask themselves if they believe Fanny's story. Some viewers will say, "yes," while others will say, "no." The director has not been aiming to impress the audience, but rather to get them to consider what is really important in life and to be a part of the story. The director has been able to do that by portraying Fanny as a person with an interesting and unique story that requires her to give herself up. In the end, the audience will be a part of Fanny's journey.


Write a review