SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online The Times of Bill Cunningham

(193) 6.4 74 min 2018

The Times of Bill Cunningham is a movie starring Bill Cunningham and Sarah Jessica Parker. A new feature film documentary about legendary NYTimes photographer Bill Cunningham.

Starring
Sarah Jessica Parker, Bill Cunningham
Genres
Documentary
Director
Mark Bozek

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles 日本語  Čeština  Português  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres Documentary
Director Mark Bozek
Writer Mark Bozek
Stars Sarah Jessica Parker, Bill Cunningham
Country USA
Also Known As The Times of Bill
Runtime 1H 14M
Description A new feature film documentary about legendary NYTimes photographer Bill Cunningham.

Top reviews

Monday, 06 Jul 2020 08:10

This documentary covers the transition from the security class of the school to the security of the school and the war between the different elements that developed and have shaped the school. The story of the age-old conflict between the faculty and the students in the school. By this time the school is surrounded by a huge wall and the great struggles between the two elements. The people behind the walls and the people who fight for their survival. From the transition of the teachers from the students, to the teachers and the students battling for their life. This documentary covers the struggle of the teachers in a school with an almost closed wall that makes it impossible to talk about anything that can be dangerous. The film was made by Kyle Gass and the father of the student who is being sued by the school. The director was Kyle Gass, the producer was Nicole Casey, the cinematographer was Corey Waddell, the editor was Nate Sorenson and the music was completed by Zac. The music was composed by Nate Sorenson and the film was shot in Brooklyn, New York. This film was shot with an off-camera and a video camera. The documentary was edited by Nicole Casey, who was the music editor. The actors were composed by Ryan Van Dyke, who was the producer, the director was David Lamb, and the executive producer was Mike Mills. This film was filmed in June 2012. I think you should check out the documentary. I recommend you to watch this documentary as well as The Sun in 2013. I also recommend to watch this documentary because it will give you an idea about the problems of the school and the other students that are in the school and that fight for their life.
Friday, 19 Jun 2020 04:46

Bill Cunningham was one of the foremost photographers in the history of World War II and the Mediterranean theatre. His work in The Times of Bill Cunningham: Triumph of the Will: Taking Our Country Back was a fascinating look at the battle for the hearts and minds of the American people as they swung from one side to the other of the battle over Vietnam. The story, all of which I saw on film, shows how the media coverage was front and center during the Vietnam war and how this influence allowed many of the Americans who were turned off by the war to go along with the war, or in many cases to stand by and do nothing at all. It was this kind of influence on the people's conscience that finally drove this war to a stalemate in which the war came to an end and the media went home. Mr. Cunningham had a political agenda and therefore he pushed the American people to turn to the media for a common cause. The overall result was that for the first time in the history of American warfare, the military press was not the leading voice. They were used to do their jobs and to report on what happened. They didn't push for changes that didn't make sense or were without any value. If a soldier had died because the political press was too weak to report on the facts, then they would have been the first to report the deaths. By the time the press went home, a soldier who was dying was one of the few things that American soldiers cared about. This picture shows that many Americans were unwilling to leave their collective comfort zone and put their lives on the line in order to do something that was not popular with their own party leaders. This picture tells how the American people, and especially those who wanted to become leaders of the world, were blinded by their own political agenda and were blinded by the press' lack of information that was the catalyst for the Vietnam War. Many people would have been happy to go along with the decision if they had a chance to do something positive for their country. To take a different opinion was considered too risky and a risk that did not seem to pay off. If you want to see a good picture about the Vietnam war, see The Times of Bill Cunningham: Triumph of the Will: Taking Our Country Back. I hope that in the future, more films like this are made.
Saturday, 06 Jun 2020 05:47

In 1957, a mysterious man came to America to help with a huge project. The project was to be a self-contained community in a small American town in the Midwest. This man, known only as "Bill Cunningham," was the resident physician and he was called by the group leaders to join them. After he joined the group, he became the top physician of the community, earning a lot of respect for the community. At that time, the community seemed to be thriving, but something went wrong. He never knew why he was being held by the government for over three years. He only knew one thing for sure; he had to come out of the program. "I can't help it," he says, "I am stuck in a bureaucratic nightmare that keeps me from spending my days happily with my wife and daughter." While Bill was imprisoned, the officials were afraid he might spread the information to the community. This movie tells the story of what happened to him in prison. The narration is in Swedish, and it is pretty hard to understand at times, but it is easy to understand what is going on. Most of the events that were shown in the film happened in 1967, the year the movie was made. The director was Tony Curran, who had previously directed three movies, "The Black Panther," "Shame," and "Carnage." Also, Curran's brother James, who was also the editor of the film, worked on the movie as well. His other brother Bill Jr. has a smaller part in the movie and that was to explain to viewers how the two brothers came to be related to each other. In this movie, the film maker gives a little history of the Swedish immigrants and the history of the communities that they formed in Sweden. When watching this movie, the audiences can see that Sweden was a very progressive country, and the history of the past generations is shown in the film. I personally think that the story of the Swedish people is very different than the people in America. I think that this movie really shows the difference of peoples in Sweden compared to the American people. I think that the people in the US are generally more prosperous than the people in Sweden. However, the history of the Swedish people is still very interesting to see.
Sunday, 26 Apr 2020 13:57

The film "The Times of Bill Cunningham" has many redeeming qualities, but it falls short of its ideal of a nice documentary. If there was a single highlight to this film, it would have to be the interviews with leading medical and science journalists and scientists. Though the film is well-made, it seems like the producers have not fully explored the medical science involved. If they had, they would have found that many of the journalists' and scientists' responses and comments in the film are incorrect. In addition, it would have helped the film to provide additional background information on some of the scientists and medical journalists. "The Times of Bill Cunningham" is essentially a collection of interviews, many of which are not actually about the topic of the film, but rather about the "science" of the scientists themselves, particularly Bill Cunningham and the theories of his research. For example, interviews with science journalist David Condon provide an opportunity to discuss a topic that is not specifically related to the subjects in the film, such as his commentary on the belief that "absence of evidence is evidence of absence." In fact, this movie is so underdeveloped that it does not provide an explanation of his views. Other examples of the deficiencies in the movie include the film's overuse of the word "propaganda," which is often used by some scientists as an insult. The use of the term is inaccurate and simply wrong. In addition, the film does not present much evidence to support the claims made by some scientists in its interviewees. In other words, some of the scientists interviewed are not even scientists, as we learn through their responses. The science contained in the film is flawed and is not supported by the science presented. Also, it is not clear to me how a scientist is supposed to know how to pronounce the phrase "religious-based illnesses," as the scientist's answers are not given. One example of a scientific point that was not properly presented was the point that you should try to evaluate the scientific evidence based on its own merits, which is presented in the film. Scientific evidence should be evaluated on its own merits, not on the basis of how it was presented in the film. Furthermore, the scientific evidence presented in the film is not particularly useful to someone interested in the topic. For example, the film shows that a genetic test for "the sick" can be more useful in identifying a predisposition to an illness, than it can be in predicting the outcome of the illness. However, this is not actually a scientific point because the genetic test can't be used to predict the outcome of a disease. This is a common mistake made by medical researchers, and it can be very confusing for the audience. Lastly, the lack of supporting scientific evidence was an oversight. One example of a scientific point that was not properly presented was the "mistake" of the origin of the skeleton. The filmmakers present the issue of the origin of the skeleton as an important scientific question that was originally posed by one of the scientists. However, the "discovery" of the skeleton was a scientific problem that was present in many of the scientific articles. Thus, this statement is not true. While the bone is undeniably skeletal, the scientists were not trying to explain away the apparent skeleton of a mouse that might have been created by the scientists by "a miracle." There is no magic that is "given" to the bones. Rather, these bones were being dug up by scientists, but were not being "treated" as "mysterious" bones because of the process. Rather, the bones were being excavated from a graveyard. The bones were not treated as "mysterious" bones because of their "surprising" and "lucky" nature. Lastly, the film states that "Christian Science practitioners aren't inherently evil." While there are certainly a few members of the Christian Science community who have been involved in acts of religious-based abuse, this statement is inaccurate. Many Christian Science practitioners are not Christian Scientists, and some of the Christian Scientists who are involved in acts of religious-based abuse were just practicing their faith. For example, many Christian Scientists who are involved in such practices are simply practicing their faith in a more peaceful way than that typically practiced by those Christian Scientists who are not involved in such practices. There are also Christian Scientists who engage in activities that may be legal and socially acceptable in certain Christian Communities, but are not acceptable in Christian Science communities. There are a number of Christian Scientists who engage in activities that are socially unacceptable and who are not Christian Scientists, such as practicing religion in a more socially unacceptable way. Some


Write a review