x

SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online The Front Runner

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(9980) 6.1 113 min 2018

The Front Runner is a movie starring Hugh Jackman, Vera Farmiga, and J.K. Simmons. In 1987, U.S. Senator Gary Hart's presidential campaign is derailed when he's caught in a scandalous love affair.

Starring: Mark O'Brien, J.K. Simmons, Vera Farmiga, Hugh Jackman

Genres: Drama, History, Biography

Director: Jason Reitman

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	Drama, History, Biography
Director	Jason Reitman
Writer	Jay Carson, Matt Bai, Matt Bai, Jason Reitman
Stars	Mark O'Brien, J.K. Simmons, Vera Farmiga, Hugh Jackman
Country	Canada, USA
Also Known As	O Favorito, Pewny kandydat, El candidato, 爆料世代, The Front Runner - Il vizio del potere, Favorit, Der Spitzenkandidat, Candidat favori, Így ne legyél elnök, フロントランナー, Ο υποψήφιος, O Candidato Favorito
Runtime	1H 53M
Description	In 1987, U.S. Senator Gary Hart's presidential campaign is derailed when he's caught in a scandalous love affair.

Download drama «The Front Runner»

Blu-ray
13.66 GB

Windows
5.36 GB

Customers who watched biography «The Front Runner» also watched

26 customer reviews about history «The Front Runner»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Wednesday, 03 Feb 2021 09:51

The Front Runner is a really good movie that reminds us that no one is perfect. It is also a great character study. We see the people of 'The Front Runner', from the new, and beautiful, to the old, and the growing pains of old age. There is no explanation for the "renewal" or the "re-birth" of aging. No one is affected the same way, but they all have to deal with it. It's a great movie that will have you going all over your head and wondering what the future holds for everyone. It will show that aging can be a gift from God, but that no one can change it. The story of the old 'Front Runner' is compelling and the acting is great. This is a movie that will have you thinking about it. I give it a 7 out of 10.

Saturday, 30 Jan 2021 05:12

As I watched this movie, I found myself becoming more and more interested in the "outing" of how the Russian terrorists came to be. I didn't want the character's to "reveal" how they got there, but I also had to see how they got there. So I kept watching, and kept watching, and didn't stop until I was completely intrigued. The acting was excellent in this movie. The problem with the film was it was too long. My 10 year old son couldn't sit still for the entire movie and actually asked me to let him get up and go to the bathroom to get his little business. The worst thing about this movie was the whole "spoiler" section, and I ended up "spoiling" the whole movie, so to speak. If this movie was as good as I thought it was, I'd be really upset with the film. I'd rather have a broken film than a great film. I'd rather have my movie ruined than a great film.

Monday, 04 Jan 2021 07:28

Just a few things to add to the first comment: The movie is about Margaret Thatcher, not the French Revolution. The movie doesn't even deal with the British Revolution, which is not a bad thing. I think the movie was well done, and shows what an important man Margaret Thatcher was. I have to say it's the first time I've seen a movie about the French Revolution and I found it fascinating. The movie does a good job portraying the situation and the people that were involved. It does not pretend to be anything more than an historical movie, and that's what is so good about it. The movie is not anti-war, anti-leftist, anti-giant, anti-the-Masses, or anti-British. Margaret Thatcher didn't support any of those ideals, and that's the movie's message. The movie, like its subject matter, is very important and very well done. Margaret Thatcher's role in world events was large, but in the movie she doesn't get her own time in the limelight. At least, the movie is honest in not taking her side on any of the major issues. As for the man who played her husband, he is a fine actor and he does a good job. It was very cool watching his character. The movie is definitely worth watching, and you should definitely go see it.

Saturday, 02 Jan 2021 14:39

Back in 2008, people had a bad case of mistaken identity. Some people were confused as to what the president of the United States was, then, another was found to be a member of the communist party. Now, in 2016, that whole story is not quite the same as before, and the question is whether or not the movie will be the same. The answer is that while the movie is good, it isn't great. It's a good story, but it is ultimately weak, and it can't make up for the weak story. I like the movie. I like all the actors, and I like the great acting by Tom Hanks. I was moved by the movie, and I didn't mind the weak story. I'll say it again. I liked the movie. But this doesn't make the movie a great movie. It's a good movie, but it's not a great movie. Just like his other movies, John Singleton did a great job with all of them. I recommend the movie.

Saturday, 26 Dec 2020 12:54

As a Christian, I can tell you that Tim Robbins does a lot more justice to his role in the film than Christian Bale did. It wasn't overly Christian, I'm afraid. Although I am a Christian, I was surprised that Robbins' character didn't bite off more than he could chew. It's true, he was a hero, and the story is about how he used the religion to win his war against the communists. But I felt he did more harm to his religion and his country than good. He probably believed in his faith to believe in himself, but it was probably more about himself, rather than Jesus. It was more about making a big "welcome back" for his father, who is sick. It's true that at the end of the film, he had his life restored, and that was a great victory. But, overall, it seemed that his faith in his faith is what had him winning. I can see why some would be impressed by the film, but I think it's too much an American victory story. The good thing about the film is that it isn't Christian propaganda. It's told as it was, not as it was in a film made by a Christian who has a bigger hand than a little one. Tim Robbins plays an extremely inspiring role and deserves a good Oscar, but he probably won't win. I think he did a great job, but he would have been better off playing the son of a church founder or the son of a poor little boy. He also probably would have won his Oscar for best actor, but the person who deserved it wasn't nominated for best supporting actor. I hope the Academy judges their decisions with more sense. Anyway, I can't really give more than a 5.5, and I'm giving it a 7.5 just to correct that it's Christian propaganda.

Sunday, 20 Dec 2020 06:10

I really liked this movie. I was just amazed by the story of Kristin Stewart, Charlize Theron and Tom Hanks. I was just interested on how the journey is with these three people. And to see the transformation of Kristin Stewart. The movie is just good, I guess you will like it, maybe you will not. This is a good movie to watch. And the effect of the movie is really good, but the acting is a bit disappointing. 7/10

Wednesday, 16 Dec 2020 01:45

I'm still trying to get over the fact that this movie sucked. If I'd been given another movie to see I probably would've passed, but I just saw this last night and I was utterly disinterested and turned it off. So maybe it was a bad movie, maybe it was a good movie, maybe it was just crap. But there's nothing worse than wasting your time with a movie and then finding yourself thinking about it a few days later. This is exactly that. I honestly feel so much better about this movie than I did the night I saw it. It was pretty lame. There's no reason to go see it, unless you like seeing slop.

Thursday, 03 Dec 2020 12:17

Some good historical accounts from around the world have been drawn from the writings of Joseph Conrad and others. At times, however, I have found them overly glib and didactic, despite having been told that this was a true story, when it's clear they were not. The film about the first world war comes to mind. More recently, the film called "Troy" dealt with an ancient culture of the southern part of Italy. The film did an excellent job of explaining the differences between ancient Rome and the barbaric barbarians who invaded its cities and conquered its lands. If the film was to be made with the intention of telling a history, it would have been better, I think. However, since it is supposed to be more of a drama, it leaves out so many things. For example, there are many strange things that happened that were probably not explained at all. The film tells us that Leonardo's parents were French, and while it's true that they were French, we don't know what made Leonardo French. We know that Leonardo's mother and father were Italian, but it seems that they weren't Italian. We're told that Leonardo was apparently exiled from Italy. Perhaps we'll find out if this is true, but the film gives us little information about Leonardo's fate. Perhaps he didn't die. Perhaps he lived to be an important figure. Whatever the case, the film gives us little information. Leonardo was probably known to have had a very strong Christian faith. He is shown visiting a church in London. However, it's not clear what happened there. Maybe Leonardo met up with a group of good-hearted young men, which were there to help him and his sister escape from the Nazi concentration camp. If Leonardo was in Britain, he wouldn't have been able to escape from the camps in Germany. And how did Leonardo make it to London? We're told that he ended up in the country house of a writer who was much older than Leonardo was. There, Leonardo was befriended by a woman who was a noble, nobleman. Her son is shown fleeing a bad storm in a boat. The man who was sailing the boat was Italian, but Leonardo was clearly British. A woman was shown leaving an estate for a trip to the country house of the writer. The estate was the most mysterious place of all, until the film decided to show it in detail. Leonardo must have had a great story for the writer to want to befriend him. The writer was portrayed as a true gentleman, but we never know why he took Leonardo in. Leonardo would be a literary star who had a great story. He would have been an important figure in Europe. Instead, the writer was shown to have an inferiority complex that had him in an unappreciative position of social superiority. He was unappreciative of Leonardo for taking him in, and therefore didn't deserve to know him. Leonardo's path wasn't as good as it could have been. We are told that Leonardo was Italian and spent some time in France. There are some great lessons about loyalty in film, but a young Leonardo might have learned the lesson of loyalty to his family. We know that Leonardo and his family were imprisoned in Germany, but Leonardo probably had a family that welcomed him and loved him. But when he returned to Italy, his family didn't get along with Leonardo. Leonardo's father was shown to be a cold, insensitive person. We are shown that Leonardo's father suffered from mental problems, and the father didn't care for Leonardo. Leonardo's father had a good influence on him. Leonardo might have learned a lesson, but it wasn't what he expected. Leonardo may have had a great story, but it wasn't as great as he thought. This film is set in the early 1800s, and yet I never see any black people in it. While I like that, I'm glad that the film left out that, while there are black people in it, they don't show up until the end. It would have been great if they did. This film's plot seems to be going nowhere. Leonardo's story and how he came to learn of the change in the world from Pope Pius II is never explained. There are some elements that do work, but I think they should have been elaborated on more. In any event, the film doesn't tell us enough about Leonardo to draw us into his story. We see Leonardo's adventures on the road. But we don't really see

Friday, 27 Nov 2020 05:33

This movie was amazing. I have seen the original movie so many times, I can't really compare it to the original. I can't help but say that I really enjoyed this movie, especially the first half. The movie also reminded me a lot of Sunshine. I like the plot of the story, it was a very good plot and the romance was good. All the characters were interesting, I like how Jim was obsessed with his family and the story line about his brother and sister was really good. As usual, there was great chemistry between the characters, the movie was a great romance movie, and I highly recommend it. My rating would have to be 7/10.

Friday, 20 Nov 2020 03:47

The film features Michael Caine, (a great Oscar winner), as a Grand Marshal for the American monarchy in the 1800's. He is facing three counts of treason: He is in the business of distributing national newspapers for the British government, he was a foreign spy for the U.S. government, and he wants to marry a Native American woman. After his meetings with all of the suspects, including the Prince of Wales, his father (a great job of acting), is proven right. The film's narrative is set in the 1800's. The most interesting characters are those in the background of the story. So, there are lots of distractions, for example, they are looking for a ritual where women's hair is cut off, and they find it at a political meeting, and the two leading men want to kill the women for it, which is a confusing plot line, especially if you look at the movie. The film is full of symbolism, and the music scores are amazing. The movie was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, and won for Best Sound, Visual Effects, and Costume Design. Overall, the film is a great picture, but the movie had a poor narrative and a confusing plot line.

Sunday, 15 Nov 2020 23:22

A picture with a title like the "Front Runner" is at the very least a strange title for a film that is not remotely about the corruption of a true American president. But we've seen this movie before and, if nothing else, we've seen it before in such a manner as to make it less-than-taut when considering a movie as a whole. In that regard, the effort put forth by some of the cast was very impressive. I will not dwell on the performances, but I'll point out the strengths and weaknesses that I saw in the performances. I really enjoyed the performance of Alan Arkin, who is clearly a man of great talent and talent worth emulating. That said, I didn't see him as the Russian presidential advisor in the film. I saw him as the man who works at the Hillhouse. Having said that, I think that the role was played very well by several other actors. I thought that Haley Joel Osment was very good in his portrayal of Donald Trump. I liked the way that he played the role of a younger, wiser, more sensitive, more complicated version of Trump. The biggest weakness, however, was the lack of a real plot and the manner in which the plot line was handled. Not really a big problem, but I would've liked to have seen more explanation as to how Trump came to the position he was given. This would have helped the movie feel more complete, more complete. I think that, without giving away any more of the plot, it would've made for an interesting and memorable viewing experience, but it did not do that. I don't think that there are many directors who have been given the opportunity to direct movies as big as this and yet have not done the best that they could with it. Most of the time, this means that the movie feels at times like it's trying to do too much, but the acting is still very good and the direction is good. So I think that we've come to the end of the other side of the fence. I think that we're at the halfway point of the production of this movie. It's still a good movie, but I think that it will have to be seen with another person, someone who is not biased against Donald Trump, or someone who doesn't mind picking apart the integrity of a movie by reading the plot summary. This movie is a good movie. It's also not that great a movie, but it's better than a lot of the movies that are coming out.

Tuesday, 03 Nov 2020 09:54

I have been a Tom Hanks fan for many years. I saw his earlier films like 'The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension' and 'The Postman Always Rings Twice'. Then, I saw 'Lincoln', which was great, but slightly disappointing. Then, I saw 'Silver Streak', which was great, but not as great as 'Lincoln'. Finally, I saw 'Lincoln', which was great, and most importantly, amazing. I saw it twice in a cinema, and it is one of my all time favourite films. I really love it, and believe it to be one of the best movies ever. The film was based on true events, and it is highly researched and very factual. The whole thing was brilliant. Its action, violence, drama, history, I must say, was amazing. The story was great, and it was very intriguing. This film is superb. The performances are great, the themes are great, the story is great. I have to say, 'Lincoln' is brilliant. If you haven't seen it, I suggest you do!

Friday, 16 Oct 2020 21:00

I have enjoyed all the Bourne movies, but have struggled to enjoy this one. The problem is the director was not about the Bourne films, but rather about his own movie. This film seemed to be more about his views on religion and politics. The fact that he tried to present a religious story was not effective, and also did not really lend credibility to the story. It seemed like it was just a political statement and not very exciting. He also made a few mistakes. The casting of MacGregor and Garland was probably the biggest mistake. Garland was very good as Thomas Raden, but MacGregor did not seem the right choice for Raden. It was clear that he was not using his knowledge of the character. The rest of the cast was good, but again, it was not very convincing. This movie was a long slow drag. It was good if you liked the previous Bourne films, but if you like action, you may not enjoy this film.

Sunday, 20 Sep 2020 04:25

This is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I was so impressed with this movie that I watched it twice in one day. It was such a great story about one of the greatest heroes of our time. I don't know if it is just me, but I loved every minute of this movie. The acting was amazing, the cinematography was amazing, and the story was so inspiring. I was so impressed with the story, and the way it was told. I hope you will love this movie as much as I did.

Sunday, 13 Sep 2020 19:24

All the focus on John Fitzgerald and his contributions to the Panama Canal was important in how the film was crafted. The film had a set of many flaws. For example, it really did not tell the story of the Panama Canal. They are not depicted in the film. This is an interesting point, as the Panama Canal does matter. It is a concrete part of the American history and was a huge political event. But it is not portrayed in the film. When you see the film, you get the idea that it is very simple. In this respect, the film could have been even better. In addition, one could have been more intrigued by the perspectives of people from the rest of the world. However, this is a minor fault. The film does a good job at highlighting John Fitzgerald's contributions to the Panama Canal. It is shown as a one-man effort. He was awarded a certificate of merit for this work. This is how great filmmakers work. The acting is great from top to bottom. Kevin Spacey, Chris Cooper and Jessica Chastain all do a great job. I also liked the part with Michael Pena. Kevin Spacey is really great. But the highlight of the film is John Fitzgerald. He is fantastic. His performance is pure class. He is a top-notch actor. I did not expect this film to be such a good film. It is an epic story. It is about history. It is about the world. It is about the events that changed the world and the way people think. I really enjoyed watching this film.

Thursday, 03 Sep 2020 01:01

This is the story of the 1989 Chicago World's Fair, and it is about how the fair was funded. The story begins when the fair opens, and ends when the fair closes. At first, the film focuses on the work of some of the great architects who built the fair. The story is a little bit uneven. The story of the great architects is nice, but the story of the fair is a little bit uneven. The movie is also about the theme of the fair, which is that we should be grateful for the things we have, and the things we have should be valued. The story also shows how our world is not perfect, and we have to work to make it better. It also shows how we can make the world better, and that is what the movie is about. The movie is very well-made. It is a great story, and it is beautifully told. The cast is amazing, and the actors do a great job. I would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to see a great movie about the fair.

Sunday, 16 Aug 2020 21:38

I don't think I can understand why the reviewers who gave this movie a 1 are all commenting about the politics. It is an excellent movie, and worth watching. What's not to like?

Monday, 03 Aug 2020 22:39

This movie was a lot of fun to watch. The cast was perfect and the story was very well done. I especially liked the love triangle between the main characters. I also liked the sense of humor and the portrayal of some of the characters was very well done. The movie is a great piece of entertainment. It is very funny and it has a lot of action. I highly recommend this movie to anyone who likes history, romance, comedy, war, and love. This movie has it all. It is definitely one of the best movies of the year.

Patricia Medina

Friday, 17 Jul 2020 19:15

I love this movie. I like the characters and I like the story. I think it's a great film. I also like how the director focuses on the subject of the title and doesn't get into politics. The movie is a must see for everyone. It's a story of the late 20th century and the events that made it that way. I give this movie 9 out of 10.

Thursday, 09 Jul 2020 10:12

A year after I watched this movie, I got to meet the actor who played John D. Rockefeller. I'm in my late 20's and have watched his movies since I was a little kid. He is such a great actor, I think he's in my top 10. He is so down to earth and just a great guy. It's great to see him play this part. I'm also a big fan of The Princess Diaries and I was very happy to see that the director and writer of this movie, James Ponsoldt, has made a sequel to the film. I was very happy to see that the same cast was brought back. This movie was a lot of fun. I have never been to the Bay of Pigs, but I think it's a great movie and I think the director did a great job with it. I recommend this movie to everyone. I think it's a great movie and I'm going to see it again. It's a must see movie for all.

Monday, 22 Jun 2020 06:48

I'm not a big fan of American History X but this film has changed my mind. I had never heard of the film before but I really liked it. I thought it was very interesting and well acted. There were several parts of the film that I had to look up because I did not know what they were about. It is a very violent film but it is not the type of film you can watch in the evening when you want to relax and be entertained. It is an extremely violent film but it is not a violent film that will cause any problems for people who watch it. I think it is very important for people to watch this film and understand the history behind it. It is a very interesting film and I would recommend it to anyone who likes historical films.

Tuesday, 09 Jun 2020 07:49

After a decade of searching, I finally saw this movie. I am a fan of a few actors who played a key role in this film, and I have been waiting for years for this to be released. My favorite part of the movie is the way it depicts the working conditions of the farm workers in the Midwest. The movie was well acted, well-written, and well-directed. I can't wait to see the rest of the movie. A must-see.

Friday, 05 Jun 2020 03:24

Well done! A real classic. I have never seen such an accurate portrayal of the life of George Washington. The story is well done and it is interesting to see how things change after the Revolution. There are also many historical inaccuracies which make it easy to see how wrong this movie is. It was obvious to me that the movie makers were not trying to portray the life of George Washington but rather his family. The movie makers were not trying to portray the whole family, they were just focusing on the members of the family. The scenes were not as accurate as I would have liked. There were many scenes that did not take place and were added in just to keep the story going. Also, the movie was very long. It seemed like the movie was going on for an hour and a half. The only time I really noticed the length was when George Washington is talking to his father. I really wish the movie makers had not used the scenes in the hospital. The scenes were unnecessary. I felt that the movie makers could have done a better job if they had left the scenes in the hospital and used them only for the audience to see. I also felt that the movie makers did not make the character of George Washington as good as they could have. George Washington was portrayed as being very arrogant and a very selfish man. The movie makers did not show him as being humble and good hearted. In the end, the movie was very good and very informative.

Patrick Richardson

Sunday, 03 May 2020 15:25

I just saw the movie. I was not expecting it to be anything that good. But I was so surprised. The movie is very good. I liked it. It's not an Oscar winner but it's a good movie. The movie has many good points. The characters are interesting. The actors are good. The music is great. It has a very good story. It's not one of the best movies I've ever seen but it's still good. It has some beautiful scenes. It's not an easy movie to watch but it's worth watching.

Sunday, 03 May 2020 02:33

I'm not a big fan of this type of movie. I think the only one that came close to this was "The King of Kong". But this movie is very much different. I loved the movie. It was so emotional. It is the kind of movie that you have to watch again and again. It is a great story. The actors were great. It was great to see the other side of the war. It was the kind of movie that makes you think about things you have heard about. It is a great movie. I don't think that anyone will be disappointed by it.

Friday, 01 May 2020 13:20

I'm not a fan of biographies, but I liked this one. The acting was good, the script was good, the plot was good, and the scenery was good. I really enjoyed this movie. It is about a young girl who was an inspiration to the young women of the time. I thought it was well done. I also thought the story was well told. I think it was a good movie. I give it a 9/10.

See all 26 reviews

Write a review