SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Fantastic Fungi

(859) 7.8 81 min 2019

Fantastic Fungi is a movie starring Brie Larson, Andrew Weil, and Giuliana Furci. Fantastic Fungi is a descriptive time-lapse journey about the magical, mysterious and medicinal world of fungi and their power to heal, sustain and...

Giuliana Furci, Andrew Weil, Brie Larson, Paul Stamets
Louie Schwartzberg

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio English  Deutsch  Italiano  Español  Français  Gaeilge  Svenska  Nederlands
Subtitles 日本語  Čeština  Português  Australia  한국어  Filipino  Tiếng Việt  हिन्दी 
Quality 480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres Documentary
Director Louie Schwartzberg
Writer Mark Monroe
Stars Giuliana Furci, Andrew Weil, Brie Larson, Paul Stamets
Country USA
Runtime 1H 21M
Description June 12, 2019 From the Maui Film Festival's Celestial Cinema. Imagine an organism that feeds you, heals you, reveals secrets of the universe and could help save the planet. Fantastic Fungi is a revelatory time-lapse journey, from 2019 Maui Film Festival Visionary Award honoree and director Louie Schwartzberg, about the magical, mysterious and medicinal world of fungi and their power to heal, sustain and contribute to the regeneration of life on Earth that began 3.5 billion years ago. Better yet, you'll see it through the eyes of mycologists, like renowned Paul Stamets exing about the unlimited potential of fungi in the fields of food, medicine, expanding consciousness, bioremediation, neurogenesis and treating end-of-life anxiety. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Top reviews

Friday, 22 Jan 2021 04:37

The documentaries are a wonderful and under-appreciated part of the independent film movement. They allow us to see all the people that make the world go round. The current director was an ex-director, and that can only mean one thing - it's all been done before. The documentary is more about the past than the present. The documentary concentrates on those who produced this movie, so we can see the historical context and how it relates to the current state of affairs. It is pretty much a chronological sequence of the movie as it was made. A lot of the documentaries are purely history and we are left with a history lesson. The docu is a fascinating look into how a film gets made and it leaves us wanting to know more about that process. The documentary focuses on the making of the documentary, showing how the story was made. It is also about the film. It's like watching a movie in reverse - the story is told, the director gives a narration, and then we see the film made. The process is fascinating. It's kind of like watching a movie about history being made, in reverse. In fact, it's the reverse of the process that actually happened, but it's more interesting. It's like a thriller where you're not quite sure what the plot is. There's a lot of talk about what the movie is about, but you really don't care. You can't say "Oh! It's about the making of a documentary! That's cool! I've heard about that!" You just want to get out of the room as soon as possible and see something else. It's a very fun way to spend an hour and a half.
Monday, 18 Jan 2021 00:12

No one wants to know what it feels like to be dying, but the world is full of stories of death. In the last two years, World War I, World War II and the Holocaust have had an impact on people all over the world. Some people may have only known about the Holocaust, but other people have been exposed to the horrors of both World War I and World War II. From the very beginning of World War II, people were shocked, saddened and traumatized by the loss of innocent life. As the years went by, people learned that it was nothing compared to what the Nazis had done. And, the devastation of the war made many wonder how the world would survive. In the first few days of the war, the United Nations made it a priority to protect civilians. Even if the war had ended on the same day that Pearl Harbor had, there is no question that the battle would have continued until the end of the war. That is the real tragedy of World War II. Many nations suffered, and the struggle for survival was the main focus. In the last days of the war, all of the nations that had been involved in the war in Europe were involved in a battle in North Africa. Many nations decided to move to the United States in a desperate attempt to end the war. The United States, of course, was willing to stay in the war, but the United Kingdom refused to move to the United States. As a result, thousands of people died, but it is estimated that 1 million people died in World War II. And, millions more are not aware of the true extent of what happened. It is clear that World War II affected every corner of the world. But, there is still a lot of confusion and fear in the world today. People can easily connect the suffering of the United States to the suffering of the Holocaust. And, the sadness and the history of World War II is used to try to manipulate people into believing that the world has been better off since the war, as if it were in some way or another better off for the people involved in World War II. However, World War II is not the only recent war. The only recent war that affected the world was World War I, and World War II is the only war that affected the world. People may not realize that the Japanese were the main cause of World War II, and that the U.S. and Britain have done so much to benefit the Japanese people. But, the British and American governments have been involved in war crimes as well. The Japanese government was responsible for the worst war crimes of all of history. More than 200,000 people were killed by the Japanese in the United States. More than 10 million were killed by the Japanese in the Soviet Union. More than 20 million died in World War II. There were more than 100,000 bombings of cities in Japan. More than 2 million Americans were killed in World War II. The Japanese were involved in some of the worst atrocities of World War II. Some people can be forgiven for not knowing the true facts about World War II, but I think it is very important to know what the facts are, and to be educated about them. For example, when I first saw the movie "D-Day" (The Day the Earth Stood Still), I thought that the movie was about how the war was going to end. But, as
Wednesday, 23 Dec 2020 02:14

The documentary Fantastic Fungi is a real eye-opener. It is a compilation of news footage, interviews and interviews of the scientists that produced and developed the film, together with interviews of members of the public. Some of the scientists interviewed are also present in the film, and have had to deal with the media since the film's release. There are short clips of footage from interviews that have appeared in news articles or the like, which I've put in italics. I'm going to use this format for each of the short segments, not as a separate sentence but as a summary. Fantastic Fungi features people from all over the world, and many who don't live in the US, so it's not a documentary you're likely to find in any book store or at the library. The media coverage is, in many cases, quite misleading. Scientists working with CFS are constantly bombarded by phone calls, they do interviews for the TV shows that rely on their expertise, and they find themselves describing their work to other scientists who, of course, have a lot more experience than they do. Most of the science being discussed is novel, but not well-established. There are certainly some who are doing excellent work. Many more have done good work, or have done very poor work, but are not in the spotlight. The scientists interviewed are generally interested in the research, and a lot of them are very knowledgeable about the topic, and you don't see many of them give interviews in the press. It's a great document, and it's well worth the time. See it.
Friday, 18 Dec 2020 21:49

Fantastic Fungi was made in 1998 with the full intention of bringing the scientific discoveries of the 20th Century to the masses. The movie starts with one of the most famous quotes from Albert Einstein, in which he states that the laws of Nature are timeless and there is no distinction between 'age' and 'nature'. This, of course, is a theoretical statement, but that is what makes the film brilliant. Most documentaries follow a simple pattern of having someone telling a story of a scientific discovery or a scientific story. They can be boring and they do not do justice to the topic. Fantastic Fungi, however, has a very unique style and uses the body as an instrument to tell the story. The movie begins with a sequence with Charles Darwin, and then proceeds through his life. The narration is narrated through the appearances of himself, talking to his wife about the progress of his work and showing the variety of plants that were grown and his experiments in a laboratory. There are also scenes with Henry David Thoreau and Charles Darwin, but the best scenes are with Charles Darwin. The movie works with an extremely powerful voice, which can make you feel as though you are watching an experiment in a laboratory. This is what I was most interested in when I heard the voice of the man who played the part of Charles Darwin. Richard Attenborough does an excellent job with his narration, and speaks from the heart. He takes the viewer to a deeper level of what he wants to tell and is never out of context with his story. A big thank you to Richard Attenborough for his amazing work in this film. Fantastic Fungi also brought the world to see the amazing work of Charles Darwin's and his wife's research. This is a movie you should not miss.
Monday, 26 Oct 2020 09:05

Hollywood film production has always had a very strict character build-up. Whether it's a young actor in an adult role, or a mature actor in an immature role, it's always true to type. The actual film itself is so different, and so different that its almost unnoticeable. It's all so random, you never know what you're going to see. It's almost impossible to tell what's going to happen next, and it's absolutely stunning to see it happen at all. The key element here is the way that every character is played, especially the odd couple they play, the "old" man who thinks his cat is a feline and his wife who thinks it's a raccoon. These two are played by Michael Douglas and Dermot Mulroney, who were both at their best in "Forrest Gump", and they've only gotten better since then. So we follow their various lives and decide to get to know them, and they do so wonderfully. The film is primarily told through their interviews, and the way that they talk about each other is, in some way, amazing. There is a point in the film where they are talking about being married to one another, and they had been together for 16 years, and they really didn't want to talk about the whole thing again. It's because they really weren't ready to talk about it. They were still in shock, and in some ways, they had forgotten how much they love each other. But they wanted to have the talk, because they wanted to remember it. In some ways, it's almost sad how they managed to forget their love for each other. This is a rare film to come along. There's nothing revolutionary about it, and it's not art, it's just a film. But it's also something else, and that's what makes it such a compelling movie. It's really really good.
Sunday, 18 Oct 2020 00:15

This is a movie that is "epic in scale." Despite the obvious comparison to "Dark Star," it is a far better film. To begin with, the set design is absolutely breathtaking. The lighting and settings are a beautiful showcase for visual fantasy. The production design is nothing short of amazing. Special effects are amazing as well. As far as the acting goes, some of it is fantastic. Morgan Freeman, David Bowie, and Mick Jagger all put in great performances. They can all be truly recognized as the stars they are. Yet, the movie suffers from some minor issues. The last section of the movie is somewhat rushed. I'm not sure if it was a technical issue, or the actors could not fully relax while on camera. Also, I think the final battle scene was over acted and over filmed. As a result, I don't think I will be surprised to see the movie fall to "Titanic" or "Lord of the Rings" in the box office. The real downfall of the movie is the length of the film. It was too long for the movie to carry it's own weight. "Dark Star" had a more interesting plot. It is possible that many of the movie's flaws stem from the overall bad script. "Fantastic Fungi" did have a plot, but it was so poorly executed that I don't believe it will get as much praise as "Dark Star." Perhaps that is the way movies are. I do not recommend this movie to those who are looking for a truly epic film. It is not the sort of movie that should have been made. Instead, I would recommend it to those who are looking for a good look at "Fantastic Fungi." I really enjoyed the movie, and I would highly recommend it to anyone.
Friday, 24 Jul 2020 16:00

Wes Anderson films are often talked about as the personal "zombie" of the director. They are almost always talked about in the same context of what "creates" an illusion, or how a certain character or scene is just "wrong" for the film. This is because, in the same way that you might describe a creature movie as "wrong" for a film where animals are in action, Wes Anderson's films are wrong for a film that uses animals as props. But, this film is actually funny and entertaining. Although it is one of the first movies I ever heard of Anderson's name, I've always enjoyed his work. This film is something of a statement about Wes Anderson's own life. Anderson does not speak in the traditional way, talking about his own experiences and relationships, but about how he thinks and feels. He doesn't have a single, natural voice. But he does, for the most part, portray himself with a lot of awkwardness and confusion, with a self-consciousness that is both hilarious and a little creepy. At times, his writing may seem like it is an attempt to tell his own stories, but he goes for a subtle style that you can almost see from a distance. And what the heck is with the name? He is obviously supposed to be a "creepy" filmmaker, and it all works. The film is a little like a musical, as it involves a lot of musical numbers, and some very strange music. The strangeness is there, and it is used to heighten the surreal effect of the film, as well as to create an atmosphere that is constantly changing and threatening. The main character of this film, Sebastian, is a man in his mid-twenties who is depressed about his life. He has a wonderful girlfriend, but he has trouble with the fact that she is going to be a mother. He has a job that he hates and the wife is on the verge of divorce. He is living with his mother-in-law, who has a painful illness and keeps their marriage a secret. In fact, he keeps his mother-in-law, whom he calls "Mom", alive through a lot of drugs and injections, and she keeps this secret from his father. Sebastian is a pretty normal, and at times, almost charming, man. However, when he is upset, he can be so dramatic. He is constantly acting as if he has done something wrong, as if he is being punished. He makes up stories to help him understand the impact of his mood swings, and to explain why he feels so bad. His girlfriend, on the other hand, is an articulate woman. She is funny, and has a lot of fun with her boyfriend, and is not at all judgmental. She is used to reacting to Sebastian's mood swings and to his "invalidating" behavior. She is really kind, and has a lot of good things in her life. Sebastian is also a master of his art. His "amazing" drawings and photographs are great, but they seem not to have been done in a professional manner. He has a way of capturing the surreal and the surrealistic, and using it to his advantage. He does not do this to make a statement, but to demonstrate his talent. He does this in every scene he is in. He is a real artist and uses it to his advantage. His "art" has a lot of randomness to it, and it all works in his favor. But, if I were to nitpick, I would say that some of the "art" was sort of cliche. Some of the way that he presents the world is a little too familiar. It reminds me of a lot of the artworks that are shown in films. And the way that he uses his music in the film was a little, a little annoying. He seems to have a lot of fun with his music and his performances, but I don't really think it adds much to the film. Some of his music is just terrible, and he uses it very little. One of the highlights of the film was the way that the song, "You're the Best Thing About Me" came into the film. It is not just a great song. It is also really strange. A lot of the film is actually just a dream that Sebastian is having. It is like a dream, but with a story. It is a really cool dream, and it is both a nice and cool dream that was great. It is great that the film did not try to make a big statement on racism or something like that
Sunday, 12 Jul 2020 12:02

Fantastic Fungi is a strange film. It's not a documentary, but a loose narrative that is fascinating in its own right. And you will be watching it with a weird, surreal and surrealist sort of attitude. The film is a capsule of some of the greatest artists and philosophers of the last 50 years, including such luminaries as Michelangelo, Hans Holbein, and the late, great Michel Nanni (who has an inimitable voice, voice that is very good for the role of "Freud"). The footage is mainly from interviews, and if the film did not use a lot of voices, it would seem to be almost entirely composed of interviews. However, the interviews are interesting and could almost be considered as a one-man show. It is also interesting to see some of the artists' reactions to what they had just heard, as well as the artworks and artifacts that they have been asked to comment on. Some of the reactions are interesting, as well as funny, but for the most part, the movie is just that. The documentary feel of the film really makes it a very strange, surreal and surrealist experience. The interviewers are charming and well-done. The viewer will find it very hard to make any sense of it, which is to be expected, as the film is very weird and surrealist. That is part of its charm. You will be caught up in the strangeness, and will feel lost and lost inside. But then, there is something else going on. The strange, surrealist (or surrealist, if you will) atmosphere of the film is a real treat. It will keep you going and keep you guessing. It is always unpredictable and always different. The strangeness of the interviewers and their art and ideas is not just subjective, but objective. It seems as if they know exactly what they are saying and it feels very intelligent. You will be surprised and intrigued. It is not often you get that kind of reaction to art, or art-related films. I would say that Fantastic Fungi is a strange film, but it is also one of the most enjoyable and exciting films of the year.
Friday, 01 May 2020 15:20

From a scientist who is an evolutionary biologist, to a budding environmentalist, Dr. Will Sarno gives us a look at the intimate details of the lives of some of the world's most fascinating organisms. Dr. Sarno, in his own words, gives us an insider's view of these creatures living, breathing, and thriving. The film is worth a look if you are a fan of science, nature, or even just an animal lover. The footage is so beautiful and informative that it may give you a better understanding of the creatures that make up the world. Some of the highlights of the film include a short interview with T. Rex, a giant tortoise that has lived on the Pacific floor for 150 million years; a video with a snails that is the size of a small car; a tiger shark named Ophiocordurfer that weighs about the same as a paper airplane; a whale that can dive 2,500 feet under water and an awesome video of a beaver that is six feet tall and weighs about thirty pounds. Most of the footage is shown in wonderful 3D but there is also some footage that is in two or three-dimensionality that adds to the film. Also worth mentioning is the fact that Dr. Sarno gives a brief description of the "Endangered Species Act". The film contains information on the different species and their habitats and even a brief description of a species that is not named in the film, called the barnacle. A special mention to the filmmakers who did a great job of not turning the film into a tourist film and gave us a true-to-life perspective of some of the creatures of the natural world. At the end of the film there is a discussion that Dr. Sarno has with two of the scientists who are featured in the film, one being a biologist and one being a scientist. The two discuss how they feel about the film and the situations they faced when filming it. The filmmakers also give advice for future filmmakers about how to conduct interviews with the animals. Overall, this is a must-see for anyone who is interested in the wonders of the natural world and the lives of these creatures. If you do not have a passion for nature, you might not want to see this film. If you do have a passion for nature, you might even want to see this film.

Write a review