x

SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Mary Queen of Scots

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(34780) 6.3 124 min 2018

Mary Queen of Scots is a movie starring Saoirse Ronan, Margot Robbie, and Jack Lowden. Mary Stuart's (Saoirse Ronan's) attempt to overthrow her cousin Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie), Queen of England, finds her condemned to years of...

Starring: Jack Lowden, Joe Alwyn, Saoirse Ronan, Margot Robbie

Genres: History, Biography, Drama

Director: Josie Rourke

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	History, Biography, Drama
Director	Josie Rourke
Writer	John Guy, Beau Willimon
Stars	Jack Lowden, Joe Alwyn, Saoirse Ronan, Margot Robbie
Country	USA, UK
Also Known As	Mary, šotlaste kuninganna, Marija, Skotijas karaliene, Marija, Škotijos karaliene, Maria Stuart, Königin von Schottland, Marie reine d'Écosse, Marija Stjuart kraljica Škotske, Μαίρη, Η Βασίλισσα της Σκοτίας, Kaksi kuningatarta, Marie Stuart, Reine d'Écosse, 雙后傳, Maria, królowa Szkotów, María, reina de Escocia, Két királynő, Marija Skotska, Mary regina Scoţiei, Mary Malkat ha'Scottim, Maria, Rainha dos Escoceses, Maria regina di Scozia, Marija Kraljica Skotske, ふたりの女王　メアリーとエリザベス, Mary, Queen Of Scots, Maria Stuart, dronning af Skotland, Las dos reinas, Marie Stuart: Reine d'Écosse, Mary, Queen of Scots, Mariam Stiuarti Shotlandiis Dedofali, Duas Rainhas, İskoçya Kraliçesi Mary
Runtime	2H 4M
Description	Mary Stuart's (Saoirse Ronan's) attempt to overthrow her cousin Elizabeth I (Margot Robbie), Queen of England, finds her condemned to years of imprisonment before facing execution.

Download history «Mary Queen of Scots»

Blu-ray
13.77 GB

Windows
5.47 GB

Customers who watched drama «Mary Queen of Scots» also watched

15 customer reviews about biography «Mary Queen of Scots»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Saturday, 07 Nov 2020 14:47

I can't say I was really surprised that this movie didn't do well. It was a bit of a disappointment, in my opinion. I think it was more of a personal disappointment than a professional one. I didn't like the portrayal of the historical events, the way they were presented and the way the story was told. There were parts where it seemed to be a sort of documentary, and parts where it seemed to be a drama. The film was just too dark and not really very well put together. I think the one thing that made it even more disappointing was that it seemed to be the most popular film of the year. I think it was a little bit of a misstep, that people went to see this film and didn't really know what to expect. I didn't think it was a very good movie, and I think it could have been better. I don't think it was a good film, but I'm not going to say that it was a bad one.

Wednesday, 21 Oct 2020 20:54

I've never seen the film but it seems to me that the role of Queen Elizabeth was the one that was most heavily emphasized in the film. I've also seen the play that is based on the story of Elizabeth and her reign but the movie was a bit different. Elizabeth is the one that people were most focused on and the film focused on her. Elizabeth was the Queen and the film focused on her. The film was good and very entertaining. I also liked the way the film portrayed the time period. I liked the costumes, the way they portrayed the costumes and the costumes themselves. The film was a bit dark in tone and I think that it was a good way to show the dark side of Elizabeth and her reign. I think that it was very entertaining and it was well done. It was a good film and I would definitely recommend it to others. It was well done and I would recommend it to anyone. I would also recommend that anyone who has never seen the play or not seen the film to see it. I think that it would be good for anyone who has not seen the film or not seen the play to see the film. I think that it would be good for anyone who has seen the film to see the film. It was good and I would recommend it to anyone.

Monday, 19 Oct 2020 09:04

I liked this film. I have not read the book, so I can't say how faithful it is to the story. The characters were very well drawn. The way the story was told, and the direction it took were very good. It had some flaws, but I think it was mostly due to the script. But, I really enjoyed the movie. I was a little disappointed with the ending, but it was not the worst ending I have ever seen. I think the director should have been more careful with the ending. I would recommend this movie to anyone who likes historical fiction.

Friday, 02 Oct 2020 15:11

This film, in my opinion, is just not good enough. There's so much more that could have been done with the story. I know there's a sequel, but I think they could have done a better job on the script. I'm glad that I saw the film, and I'm glad I didn't waste my money on the theatre tickets.

Friday, 18 Sep 2020 16:19

I was skeptical that The Queen of Scots would be so powerful and inspiring, but I was pleasantly surprised. It is visually stunning, the acting is above average, and the story line is very poignant. The whole movie just flowed so smoothly. I was immersed in the world of Richard II. I was captivated by this movie and will be going to see it again to finish the story and get the answer as to who he is. I look forward to seeing it again and having the same experience.

Danielle Contreras

Saturday, 12 Sep 2020 00:04

The first "Red Queen" turned out to be a charming and truly affecting film. I am not exactly sure why it was put on the back burner, but I am sure it was more of a political maneuver. However, the second one was much more gripping, and had the unusual advantage of being told from the point of view of the wives of the defeated men of the English army. A tale of English tragedy, and of the war itself. The first film dealt with the heroism of the men, but in the second one, the women's side of the story is equally fascinating. With the exception of Diana Rigg, all the actors are of equal strength, and the results are excellent. This film should have won the Oscar. Unfortunately, the nominations were denied to the "Red Queen" as it was being released. It was obvious that it was something the Academy was reluctant to approve because of the political circumstances. I hope the tradition is changed for the third film.

Monday, 07 Sep 2020 19:39

I have only seen two reviews of this film, but it seems that they are in parallel with the public's understanding of the coronation of George VI. That is a shame. It is my opinion that this film is a historically accurate portrayal of the coronation and the men who were present on both sides. The whole story is in fact quite close to the historical facts, but the way that the film was filmed and the attention that was paid to the actors' faces, was enough to show that the story was well portrayed. The best part of this film, and also the reason why I am giving this film a 9 out of 10, is the acting of both Sir Patrick Stewart and Liam Neeson. These two are the two most famous actors working today, and their performances are so believable that they make you feel they really were at that time. At times I felt that Stewart was even more convincing than Gerard Butler in Saving Private Ryan. The actors were very attentive and their expressions were so genuine that they really made me feel that the characters were really in the world. I think the film gives an important historical perspective, and I am glad that I saw this film.

Saturday, 05 Sep 2020 17:20

I just finished watching this movie and while it may not be the greatest movie I've ever seen (or at least a movie I'd want to watch again) it was actually quite interesting and worth watching. It took me out of my usual Hollywood/Hollywood-lite movies that I love to watch. No American Shakespeare. No Edith Wharton. No Tristam. No Billy Jack. It's a Scottish movie.and it's even better for that. I don't have much to say about this movie that hasn't been said before in other reviews of it. But I'll say that it was an interesting, and at times heart-wrenching, experience. It wasn't the typical drama about how hard it is for women to enter the theatre. It was a hard movie. And as a Scotsman I found it quite inspiring. I felt the sadness, the despair, the anger and love. It had a tremendous visual impact to the movie. And that I didn't expect. I'd seen it as a kid and in a cinema and was disappointed at the screen. I'd never been so happy in my life. I'm 32 years old now and for me this movie is a nostalgic trip to a place I remember from childhood. I love movies and I love to watch them. And this one is the best. My one regret is that I didn't see this one when I was younger. The theatre I saw it in was too small to handle the audiences and the action had to be in the corners. And I was a very lucky movie goer. If I'd seen it in a theatre in America, it would have been just as good. I have two daughters and they loved this movie. The acting was good and I loved the story. It's an interesting film and definitely worth watching.

Tuesday, 25 Aug 2020 20:40

I'm really glad that I watched this movie today. It's about this little girl named Mary Queen of Scots who was a popular queen for Queen Mary. She did a lot of evil things but it was in the name of God. She was kind of portrayed as a saint in this movie and that really takes the movie to another level. This movie really helps you see that Mary Queen of Scots was a very wicked queen who was the greatest enemy of God. There are many violent things in this movie and it really sets the tone of what would happen in Mary Queen of Scots' reign. All in all I highly recommend this movie to people because it is not just about the Mary Queen of Scots, but really all about Mary Queen of Scots' reign and Mary Queen of Scots. It shows you what she was really like as a queen.

Wednesday, 12 Aug 2020 21:41

What can I say about this movie that hasn't been said already? It's amazing! How they managed to portray the royal family from history to present day, even on screen, is beyond me. I know I have been to some of their very private and private homes and it's amazing to me how their families had lived and worked and interacted in such a way. There are a couple of things that the movie leaves out that make me wonder and question the history of Scotland at large: 1) The Welsh general John de Lacy who set off a revolutionary war against England at the beginning of the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. The English say he is a traitor and all sorts of stuff. Lacy is far from traitor, he is well on his way to becoming the king and was only a traitor to a king who wanted to rule England. 2) The marriage of Queen Victoria to Edward VII. Again, you have to wonder about what was in England at the time? Was this a good thing? The American statesman James Madison, and the US Constitution itself in general, say "A majority is better than a minority." So should we really accept a situation where the majority of the people voted to become the king and the queen? What is that about? 3) The English Rebellion of the 1540s, the rise of King James II (Elizabeth's brother) to become King Edward VII and the battle of Bosworth. Again, the Americans and the US constitution stand in a way for what should happen. I don't know about you but I would like to have known about all of these things that happened in my country. All of them! This movie, even though it's over 100 years old, still has enough information to make the viewer think about the way people were and the relationships we had back then. The pacing of the movie is perfect. It wasn't boring, it was nonstop from the beginning until the end. The actors are great. I especially liked the way they portrayed the family in this film and the court at large. I think they captured everything perfectly. I have to give credit to the director as well. He made this movie to show a different side of England and the royal family and he did it with style. The music was fantastic. I can't believe that the director didn't pay homage to this movie by using it for his own film, yet. So all in all, I think it was an amazing movie. Everyone has been saying "Man, the royals just don't get a break anymore." Yeah, but they have a lot more to get a break from, so I wouldn't be surprised if they get a break at any moment from now on. This movie was amazing and very relevant at the same time. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone. The only thing that I don't understand is that I don't like the British people. I think they're all criminals and rebels

Friday, 31 Jul 2020 08:13

This film was as nice as I thought it would be. The scene of the scene was quite amazing, with the different history and different locations. I am glad that many films were made about the period of the Domesday Book. It is truly an amazing story and a great love story.

Saturday, 18 Jul 2020 09:14

a beautiful piece of art, but the stench of sexism in today's film industry was over-dramatized, even for it's time. that's not fair. that's part of what this film is about. The film is about one of the most popular women of her time, the beautiful, idealized beauty queen of Scotland. The queen, Katherine of Aragon, is trying to gain power in England, first by successfully defeating a rival queen, Elizabeth I, then by winning her marriage to the king. Unfortunately, Katherine and the other ladies of the court, the ladies who had a heart of gold, have more than enough, and want to get even with Katherine by marrying the king, the king of England. Many of the ladies are nobles and warlords, and one of them is a white haired, quite handsome, suave and very much of the court. Katherine meets the king's son, James, and instantly becomes enamored of him, and her life revolves around him. When Katherine comes to England, the nobles have made many promises of marriage to her. Katherine is fascinated by the king's son James, but she realizes that he is a boy who has a troubled past, and when she learns that James is an illegitimate child of the king's mother, Katherine is furious, but finds herself loving James, and maybe finding out her first true love. She spends all her time with James and trying to have an affair with James' father, the king. To all of the ladies, Katherine is a creature of need, and she is able to attract all of them to her by making promises of marriage, and thereby giving them everything they want, to use her as a weapon. The film is fantastic. It's not a simple historical drama, nor is it a romantic drama. The film is very much about love, lust, war, royalty, and the women who became involved in it. I thought the film was stunning, and I'm still amazed by it. The film is worth seeing, and is much more than the sum of its parts. I will give it 9 stars out of 10.

Sunday, 14 Jun 2020 07:18

I found the movie to be very good, and in some ways even better than the book. I liked the fact that they made the movie a little longer, and that the movie was shot in the same location as the book. I also liked the fact that the movie was a bit more realistic, especially with the villain. I also like the fact that the movie was much more violent. I also thought the movie was a bit more realistic, in that it showed how much things were different in the 14th century. I also thought the movie was a little more realistic in that it showed the difference between the nobility and the commoners. I also thought that the movie was very well made, and in some ways better than the book. I would recommend this movie to anyone who has read the book, and to anyone who has not read the book.

Michelle Estrada

Friday, 12 Jun 2020 00:07

It is rare to find a film that is, in my humble opinion, so above par in terms of the cinematography. What we have here is an elaborate exhibition of the grittiness and violence of those times. This does not mean that it is violence-it is murder and violence is shown in great detail. Again I do not know if the director was paid to use this style, but it is very realistic and there is no glamor here-just cold, unmoving killing and one has to admit, there is some glorification of it. There is a scene where a man has his head bashed in and the lighting is well done-it is what one would expect. When the camera rests on a woman's face, looking around for her husband, a very subtle but powerful picture is created. It is not just that the film is raw and brutal, it is also beautiful. The cinematography does not have the artistic effects of "Reservoir Dogs" or "Django Unchained," but I believe that it does come close. What I enjoyed most of all is that I never felt that the film was edited or that it was slow. It seemed like a film that was well thought out and well paced-much like I am sure that it was well thought out and well paced.

Monday, 27 Apr 2020 06:29

The movie was on the big screen today. I went to see it, because I had been expecting a movie based on the real events. I loved the movie, but I could not see myself using it as a back-drop for the real events. I thought the story line was too similar to the real story, but not enough like the real story. The history of Queen Anne was not enough like the real events. I wanted to see the movie as a whole, but I was bored. I wish I could have seen the real story, but I am just glad I saw it. The actors played their roles to perfection. It was a good movie, but I have to admit I don't like the book.

See all 15 reviews

Write a review