x

SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Woman Walks Ahead

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(5032) 6.6 101 min 2017

Woman Walks Ahead is a movie starring Jessica Chastain, Louisa Krause, and Boots Southerland. Catherine Weldon, a portrait painter from 1890s Brooklyn, travels to Dakota to paint a portrait of Sitting Bull and becomes embroiled in...

Starring: Jessica Chastain, Chaske Spencer, Louisa Krause, Boots Southerland

Genres: History, Western, Biography, Drama

Director: Susanna White

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	History, Western, Biography, Drama
Director	Susanna White
Writer	Steven Knight
Stars	Jessica Chastain, Chaske Spencer, Louisa Krause, Boots Southerland
Country	USA
Also Known As	Mulher Que Segue à Frente, Uma Mulher Exemplar, A nő, aki előttünk jár, Isha tzoedet kadima, Kadın Önde Yürür, Die Frau, die vorausgeht, Kobieta idzie przodem
Runtime	1H 41M
Description	Catherine Weldon, a portrait painter from 1890s Brooklyn, travels to Dakota to paint a portrait of Sitting Bull and becomes embroiled in the Lakota peoples' struggle over the rights to their land.

Download history «Woman Walks Ahead»

Blu-ray
13.54 GB

Windows
5.24 GB

Customers who watched biography «Woman Walks Ahead» also watched

4 customer reviews about western «Woman Walks Ahead»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Thursday, 02 Jul 2020 16:58

One of the great aspects of this film is that we see the wonderful (though surely wrong) concept of sovereign states and how they relate to each other, the way in which the "pillars" of different states relate to each other and the way in which there is a tendency to balk at going through the motions. While this could be an excellent film on its own it is so well-told and nuanced that there is no real need for a sequel. So we go into the sequel. Unfortunately, there are a number of things that are far from convincing. This would have been a much better film if the title had been "Battle for Vietnam", but "Battle for Wartime" is simply a misnomer as well. Again, the film doesn't attempt to give a clear picture of what the Vietnamese actually wanted, and it is very hard to tell what exactly is going on with the Vietnamese themselves when they go to the US to present their demands. It just doesn't happen as well as it could. One thing that is pretty interesting is that while they have been so busy and successful in turning this into a "star vehicle" for everyone involved in it, the script is very dull and just shows a lack of imagination on the part of the writer. While I thought the acting was okay overall, there are only a few memorable scenes. The Vietnamese are portrayed as being mostly immoral and corrupt, and the US is portrayed as being mostly altruistic and kind. Both of these characters could have done a lot better, but I suppose this is what was needed for the American audience. Overall, the story is told very well, but not much else. As it is, it is hard to get excited about what is happening. All that said, this is one of the best war films out there, and while it has been made for American audiences in this case, it should be for anyone interested in how conflicts should be resolved.

Sunday, 07 Jun 2020 14:01

First of all, I'm not a big fan of remakes, but this is an exception. A simple movie with good performances, a well-written screenplay, is able to have a huge impact on your emotions. This movie gives the feeling of "life after death" and shows a side of the world not seen in many movies. The history, the traditions, the emotions and the art of the cinema is a must-see!

Susan Henderson

Monday, 01 Jun 2020 07:17

Tom Hanks and Samuel L. Jackson really gave an outstanding performance in this movie. I think it's very good to see them together again. The movie is a good story and good actors but the ending left me a bit confused. It's the same way like the movie. But this is more like a movie which I want to see again. It's a good story. A good story with a good actor and a good actor and good director. A good movie.

Monday, 27 Apr 2020 03:04

The book is well written, as far as I can tell. But what this movie leaves out is most of the character development, the moments where you could see the human story and how the historical events changed their lives. I know that you could see it if you were into history. It's not just about Indian/European history. It's a movie about the coming of the "Red Menace", especially the Indians, as they had to fend for themselves. The movie tries to keep you enthralled in the world in which the Indians lived. The Native Americans look like European history figures. You get the feeling that you're part of a European-Indian cultural encounter and a unique group of people. The best way to view this movie is to take it as a stand-alone film. That's fine. But I feel that the way the book is told would have made the movie far better. I also wanted to know more about the Spanish and French conquistadors and their motives. I felt that the movie could have done that, too. I think that if you just see the movie and the book as separate stories, you'll have a much better experience. It's not one of those movies where you need to see the book first. This movie is good, but it's not a great movie. It's a good movie, but it's not great.

See all 4 reviews

Write a review