x

SVT Play: All Systems Operational Normally

Watch Online Cold Case Hammarskjöld

Watch
4K Watch Movie
Start your 30-day free trial

Download
Magnet

Download
Torrent

(1744) 7.6 128 min 2019

Cold Case Hammarskjöld is a movie starring Mads Brügger, Clarinah Mfengu, and Saphir Wenzi Mabanza. Danish director Mads Brügger and Swedish private investigator Göran Björkdahl are trying to solve the mysterious death of Dag...

Starring: Clarinah Mfengu, Saphir Wenzi Mabanza, Mads Brügger, U Thant

Genres: History, Animation, Documentary

Director: Mads Brügger

x

Disclaimer: This site does not store any files.

Product details

Audio
Subtitles
Quality	480p, 720p, 1080p, 2K, 4K
Genres	History, Animation, Documentary
Director	Mads Brügger
Writer	Mads Brügger
Stars	Clarinah Mfengu, Saphir Wenzi Mabanza, Mads Brügger, U Thant
Country	Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Norway
Also Known As	Wer tötete Dag Hammarskjöld?, Nerešeni slučaj Hamaršeld, Caso abierto: Hammarskjöld, Kto zabił sekretarza generalnego ONZ?, White Is the Colour of Death, Zaboravljeni slučaj Hammarskjöld, Cold case à l'ONU, Mysteriet Hammarskjöld, Hammarskjöld, döglött akták, Hvem dræbte Dag Hammarskjöld?, Hammarskjöld byla, Murder in the Bush: Cold Case Hammarskjöld, Hammarskjöld: caso sin resolver, Odlozený Případ Hammarskjold, Fallet Hammarskjöld
Runtime	2H 8M
Description	Danish director Mads Brügger and Swedish private investigator Göran Björkdahl are trying to solve the mysterious death of Dag Hammarskjöld. As their investigation closes in, they discover a crime far worse than killing the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Download history «Cold Case Hammarskjöld»

Blu-ray
13.81 GB

Windows
5.51 GB

Customers who watched documentary «Cold Case Hammarskjöld» also watched

21 customer reviews about animation «Cold Case Hammarskjöld»

3.5 out of 5 stars

Top reviews

Sunday, 18 Oct 2020 08:48

A man decides to break his wife's spirit with the help of a Satanic mask and a pen and paper. Then he travels through time, and starts to write on the paper and he begins to dig in his own history. It's a simple concept, and you can't really get lost in it, but it's still a powerful concept. I think the documentary is a good film. It's not very deep, but it is not as simple as some of these documentaries are. It's something like this: you have a person who's not religious, and you have a film. This is one of the best documentaries of all time. I highly recommend it. It's not for everyone, but I think it's a very good film. 8/10

Thursday, 01 Oct 2020 05:24

A special, rare treat for those who enjoy interesting, fascinating documentaries. With a well researched film and several interviews, it gives a unique insight into the Norwegian investigations into the murders of at least forty school children in the 1970's. Even though it may not be 100% accurate, it is still an amazing documentary. I thought it was very interesting and, I would say, very informative. There are also a few highlights, including a story of a real Norwegian serial killer who has yet to be caught. If you are looking for a documentary to watch, then I would suggest that you give this one a try.

Saturday, 19 Sep 2020 19:29

I find this documentary quite fascinating. It details the tragic murder of another world-class human being. The film goes into detail about the investigation and the investigation into his death. The film includes many interviews with various people in the trial and shows the pre-trial examination, the trial itself, and the actual trial. The film then goes on to show a rather bizarrely surreal documentary of a psychic who has been working with this murder for years. I think this documentary should have won a lot of awards because the content is extremely thought-provoking. This documentary will change your perspective on the death of Karl Skomsgard. It will also make you think about the death of Marilyn Monroe. This film should not be missed by anyone who enjoys a good documentary.

Saturday, 19 Sep 2020 09:58

Sometimes, it's hard to tell whether a documentary is true or not. In the case of "Hotel", it's not hard to figure it out. But that's not the only big problem with this movie. It's just so slow and the narrator is so irritating. But the film does have its moments. "Hotel" definitely doesn't ruin the music genre, but it does tell its story in a very different way. I hope "Hotel" gets as much attention as it deserves.

Tuesday, 01 Sep 2020 03:02

This is an interesting documentary, a retelling of the events surrounding the murder of the heir to the Established Reformed Church of the Vikings. There are also other stories in this film, such as the relationship between Icelanders and the Norsemen, the island that the Reformed Church landed on, and the priest who leads the church to it's salvation. It is difficult to describe how good the film is. The archival footage and interviews with the leading researchers of the crime are very well done. I found it very enjoyable to see the film in its entirety, it just seems like an incredible amount of time has been spent researching and collecting information about the incident. I found the film very informative, even though the film had its parts that were quite random. Overall, the film is interesting and is worth seeing, and I recommend it to anyone interested in the subject.

Thursday, 27 Aug 2020 22:37

I'm a huge fan of the detective fiction genre. I've read the novels, I've watched the movies, I even wrote a book on the subject. When I heard that Lars von Trier was making a documentary on the so-called 'Hamburger Hamster' - a.k.a. the 'Murdersville Nine' - I got excited. I had already seen a few films about the case, and had become intrigued by the idea of a film based on a true story. This was not the case, however. Although I enjoyed the film, I was never engaged in the events of the case and found myself distracted by other things. In short, the film is not very well made, the content is a bit dry, and the movie-makers are trying to make a film out of an actual crime that was not very well-known at the time of its occurrence. In summary, a movie based on a true story that was not well-known at the time of its occurrence is a bit too ambitious and never fully convinces me as a film, and it is a bit of a waste of time. The Murderburg case was an obscure case, and it is not very well-known outside of Norway, so I don't think it deserves a documentary.

Monday, 24 Aug 2020 21:31

While the documentary format is not "No Country for Old Men" or "Fargo", it is a beautifully made film, as it deals with an issue, that should have been explored more, and in a much more real way. It is a riveting documentary that has the ability to change a person's opinion about his/her own country. But a great movie shouldn't be just a documentary, it should contain plot, which in this case is not a problem, because we can see that this is about a very real, very important issue. It also contains some nice actors, that I found interesting. It is a good documentary and, if you liked this one, you should watch "Unconditional" and "Still Water", the documentary about the consequences of a nuclear accident in Japan, that would have happened if Japan had not signed the nuclear deal with the US. Both of these films are about the consequences of a nuclear disaster. Both of them tell you something about the US nuclear policy. I have nothing against documentaries that do not have the appearance of a feature film. I did not read the books, I only watched the movie. But I just did not understand the whole picture and I do not see how that I should comment on the film, the movie is not about the US nuclear policy or the consequences of the nuclear deal. It is only about the situation that the director had to describe in his film, and that is enough for me. In the end, I liked the film, and I also like the documentary format, because it is true, it is about the consequences of nuclear energy and about the actual situation in Japan.

Thursday, 20 Aug 2020 17:06

First off, I am a big fan of director Dan Franklin's work. I like his documentaries on world news (Doubt, Freedom Fighters, Gorillas in the Mist) and he's done an impressive job of bringing an original perspective to those documentaries. I also think his videos are sometimes the best thing on the Internet, or any type of media for that matter. So, when I first saw this documentary, it really hit home. I don't know if I've ever said that about a documentary. I have been a filmmaker myself for over ten years and I have also been a very big fan of documentary as well. When I first saw this film, it gave me a new view on documentaries as I have never seen them before, that's how cool it was. I know I'm not alone when I say that. This documentary really shows what documentary is all about. It really is a collection of interviews and we learn about a lot of things we never had a clue about. I'm glad to see Dan Franklin has taken on this project, because I think a lot of people would be surprised to see how far this documentary can take you. There are some really great interviews with people like Dr. Shigeyoshi Sato, who is one of the fathers of the 9/11 tragedy, with Emyr Phillips, who was an American ambassador and friend of Osama Bin Laden. There are also interviews with Erendira Calvo, who is the wife of Jose Maria Calvo and also one of the daughters of the 9/11 tragedy. There are also interviews with Mr. Mahmood Chishti, who was one of the architects of the 9/11 tragedy, and also, there are interviews with Christopher Bollyn, who was one of the people who helped bring the original flight plans of the aircraft to the FBI. I think these interviews really help the viewers realize the depth of the people who gave us the information that we all needed to understand the events of September 11th. I really recommend this documentary, because it's a great overview of what documentary is all about.

Thursday, 20 Aug 2020 07:36

Well, first off I'll be honest, I'm a bit of a director myself, and I've always been interested in the world of documentary films, since I was a kid. And this documentary, not to mention the film, that it is, is a nice film, and I think I'm starting to understand why. But this documentary is really a slow movie, but still is great because it doesn't use really gimmicks that you'd expect from a documentary, and you really get to feel the tension and the lack of control in the story. But also I've got to say, I didn't know when I first started watching this documentary that it was really going to be something so perfect. It was really really great. It's interesting to see what documentary filmmakers do. In this documentary they really did some nice things, and I really liked the story of this guy in Iceland, and his friends and how he doesn't trust anybody, that he has to talk to everyone in a strange language, and the others. But it was the story of the guy that this guy is talking to, that was really well done, and the story is actually very powerful and very surprising. And the best part is that it's not an average documentary film, but it's still an interesting and interesting documentary. Overall this documentary is really good, but also very good. It's really good, I think that the people who want to watch a documentary about a documentary film, they're going to get a nice documentary, and the documentary that they're going to get is a great documentary. 7/10

Friday, 14 Aug 2020 23:38

A documentary about the late 1980s Swedish crime drama Hanging Up, which became one of the most iconic films of the decade. Over the years, it has been compared to Lars von Trier's Zwartbiblioth in that it is more of a "character driven" movie. While it is definitely a character driven film, it is also much more of a story driven movie. It is, however, a very interesting story. This is a film about the dark side of Stockholm, the Swedish criminal underworld, and the problems that the police, prosecutors and politicians face. The film was clearly not intended to be a masterpiece, but it certainly delivers its message and, more importantly, is very entertaining. The characters are engaging and fascinating. There are many scenes that leave you questioning everything that you just saw. And it doesn't stop there. The film is also very violent. It does have a lot of dark moments and the violence is certainly very intense. The final shot is pretty brutal. The acting is very good. The performances are what you would expect from the actors and the cinematography is very impressive. The editing is also quite good. There are many moments where the camera gets really close up, and this makes the characters really stand out. Overall, Hanging Up is an amazing movie. It is dark and violent, but it also has a lot of heart and character. It is definitely not a great film, but it is definitely a very interesting one. I give it a strong 8/10. It's definitely a film worth watching.

Monday, 10 Aug 2020 19:13

The DVD of "Hammer" is a great way to experience this film. It does not have any special features that make it more than just a "work in progress". It is just a simple movie with no dialogues and the images of the scene are just to put the viewer in a different perspective. The main reason to watch this movie is for the documentary footage and for the theme. It gives you a feel of the atmosphere of the time. This is a great example for any people who want to understand how the people of the East, who were against the war, reacted and the state of the mind of the people during the war.

Sunday, 02 Aug 2020 00:39

In a world of media, many viewers are often lured by advertisements for their favorite television shows. This documentary shows that a big part of the problem with these advertisements is the commercials that appear just before the shows. The problem is that viewers are not used to seeing commercials before a program, and so we miss the parts that are important. This documentary focuses on an incident in which a commercial aired during a TV news broadcast. The reason for the advertising was a secret which the TV station was not told. The two guys who were killed that day, were known for their knowledge in this area. Their work was not a secret, and they were well respected by the people who knew them. When they were killed, their friends were so distraught that they did not want them to know they were there. After the news broadcast, the company called the couple and told them that they were going to announce the death of two young men on the air. The reaction of the friends was such that they had no idea what the commercials would be. The company would have had the same reaction if it had advertised the same story in the local paper. If the two guys had been killed on the local news, no one would have been interested in hearing about it. So the question is, why advertise during a news broadcast? That is the question this documentary answers. The media becomes so popular that most people don't know that there are a number of people who can do such work. So the ad in the local newspaper was unnecessary. We have not seen that in a long time. The question is, why not advertise during the news broadcast?

Tuesday, 28 Jul 2020 20:14

The story of Hammarskjold is the story of the career of a Swedish architect and the struggles that he faced in the post war years. It is told in the form of documentary which shows how he struggled to cope with his circumstances, as well as how his most famous work was built. His world was turned upside down by the war, and his family was forced to move to an asylum in England. The story is told in chronological order with interviews of the people who knew him, his family, and of course the architect himself. This is a very moving story, and it shows how hard it was for him to cope with the stress of war, the effects of the war on his family, and the emotional and physical abuse he had to endure. He also spoke about the struggle he had to go through to help his family and the construction of the bridge that he died on. The most poignant part of the documentary was the piece of Hammerskjold's artwork, which is one of the most important pieces of architecture in the world. I recommend it highly.

Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 14:44

I found the documentary to be quite interesting. I was not expecting anything especially given the average amount of time on the film. The documentary did a good job in showing the facts and discussing them as well as the investigations that were carried out. I think that the final conclusions and resolutions reached in the investigation were somewhat unrealistic, but I did find it interesting to hear some of the interviews with the investigators. I found the video "Stahlblatt erfaslage" (a bit out of date, but still very good) in German to be interesting as well. I recommend this documentary to anyone who is interested in the subject.

Tuesday, 21 Jul 2020 05:13

As is often the case, a documentary is a series of snippets of previously recorded facts, and so the examples given in this film are all little snippets, so not a documentary in the traditional sense. The documentary is framed around the murder of three people in New York in 1972, in which only one of the victims survived. The third, Hans Gruber, was a young left wing intellectual who was described as "upbeat, intelligent and totally fixated on politics" by his girlfriend in the wake of the murders. His niece, Ruth, was found shot to death with an expired pregnancy in the basement of her small apartment in the neighborhood of Bushwick. The documentary's first reel shows some footage from a documentary about Hans Gruber in which he describes his uncle's views, and so the introductory frames are about a documentary about a murder. It's a bit hard to follow what's going on, but it's possible to follow along with the film because you can see a rough outline of the characters and their movements throughout the day. There's a lot of flashbacks throughout the documentary, and the most striking thing is the way the stories are told, like the story of a wake, where the deceased are first shown in close-up, and then the camera follows them from the interior of their apartments, to their funerals, to their funerals after their funerals, to the morgue, to a funeral, to a funeral after a funeral, to a funeral in a church, and so on. The stories are told from a first person perspective, and the viewer is not told the contents of any of the stories as part of the narration, but by watching how the subject of the story talks about it. This creates a rather unusual experience, and the effect of the photographs is to create the illusion of a dreamlike background, like a painting. The reason for this is that the documentary takes place over several days, so we are not told what day it is, and so we are not told how long each day lasts. When the subjects are finally shown in close-up, the photos seem to be static, but when the subjects talk about the day, they speak of it as if it was a day. One example of this is the discussion about the state of the subway system in New York City, which is told in a monologue, which is hard to follow because there's no narration. When a subject talks about the subway system, we hear the subject talking about the subway system as a whole, as a whole system, and then when the subject talks about something else, we hear the subject talking about the subway system as a whole, as a system. This style of narration might seem confusing at first, but it's actually the technique used in the film, and it creates a remarkable experience of what one of the subjects, Hans Gruber, was saying as he spoke. The second reel is a conversation between the subject and another person. In the conversation, the subject describes a conversation he had with his wife. The subject says that the conversation was a typical day at home, and when he asked why the woman didn't have an argument with him, she said that they didn't argue. He explains that when he and his wife had a fight, she would tell him, "He's right. You can't just walk away from everything." That's the kind of narration that makes the film interesting, because it's difficult to get a clear idea of what the subject is talking about, and then when we get a clearer idea of what the subject is talking about, it's even more difficult to understand what the subject is saying,

Monday, 20 Jul 2020 11:11

Watching this documentary was like seeing a documentary. There were some beautiful photos of the locations in Iceland and it also showed a lot of stories about the people involved with the film. The only real problem with this documentary was the way it was edited. It was so disjointed and difficult to follow. The story goes from one person to another. This is a problem because some of the most important things that happened to the people in the film, were not told very well. So it made it difficult to understand what was really happening. Also, the movie seemed to jump from place to place without any real explanation of where it was happening. This made it difficult to follow. I think it is better to watch it in a more relaxed mood because it was more informative. Overall, I think it was a good documentary but it would be better if it had been edited better.

Phillip Wallace

Sunday, 21 Jun 2020 21:52

I was very surprised to learn that the documentary 'Armin Muehlenfeldt' (Armin Muehlenfeldt) was being made into a movie, and for that reason I think that a better quality documentary could have been made instead of this muddled, overlong, tiring and repetitive one. I won't go into details here, but it's really difficult to review this movie as it is - because I really don't think that the movie itself is worth the time or effort to see, and this is a huge disappointment for anyone who had hoped to see something of a documentary that actually has some value. The subject matter is interesting, but not particularly original, and the film is even more useless than most of its subjects. Most of the scenes and even most of the entire documentary are contrived and some of them are completely pointless. The only thing that kept me watching it, though, was the conversation between Mr. Muehlenfeldt and his colleague 'Zimmer,' which I think was a good way to put it. I guess the one thing that this movie does have is a good attempt at telling a serious story, but I'm afraid that the plot doesn't add up to anything. And don't get me wrong, I do love history documentaries, but I'd rather see a well-made documentary that is well researched and has a good story than anything else.

Sunday, 21 Jun 2020 12:21

As someone who has had extensive experience with Army special ops, it was always a bit strange that I found myself going into this movie not knowing much about it, let alone the people who made it. This movie definitely is a must see for the Army special ops community. This documentary covers a lot of ground and is well written and made. I'm still not sure what the point of the documentary was, and there were a lot of scenes that just seemed to end and not get a proper wrap up. There were some scenes that were a little too boring. However, I highly recommend this movie to everyone who is into Army Special Operations or has any military related interest. The special effects and visuals are definitely top-notch and make this a must see for anyone who has ever served.

Tuesday, 16 Jun 2020 04:12

Being from the UK I find myself in a bit of a minority here in the US. Many of the viewers seem to think that the UK has a superior culture and lifestyle to the rest of the world. For some reason, this makes them think that a film like The Sixth Sense is completely silly and far fetched. I have always thought that the US is the most rational and scientific of all the countries on Earth. All our crimes are done in order to maintain our existence. It's a world that can stand alone and not be swayed by petty problems. To think that our country has a huge problem with the population and how it is being controlled by big corporations is insane! This film shows us that the UK is more like an independent country. It has a long history of natural disaster and tragedy, but we still manage to keep it together. The film is very well made. I found it to be very informative and interesting. It is made by people who have a real passion for the subject and will show you a story of a man who is lost and who is not ready to accept the fact that he has not found his purpose. I am certain that this film will be seen by many people. It may not be the best film ever made, but it will bring many people to the subject of what is happening in the UK.

Tuesday, 28 Apr 2020 23:12

I found this documentary to be a wonderful film, due to the unique and inspirational content. It is not a documentary film, but rather, a series of short stories. One of the stories is the first half of the film, and it is a tale of a family of Jewish immigrants to America. The second story is the story of a family that immigrated to America from Norway. The story is told from the family's point of view, with their own opinions and thoughts on the journey. The next story is a tale of a mysterious killer. It is a mystery, not a documentary, and it also is a fascinating one. It is not an "art" film, and the film is really not a documentary, but instead, it is a more of a story, and is not made as such. The last two stories are the only "art" films in the film. They are also very entertaining, and were also inspired by their respective authors, and it was quite good to see the different people who were involved in the film. It was fascinating to see how the work of the film was done. Some of the elements of the movie, such as the voice over, are not very well done, and can be quite annoying, but this is not a film that is made for me to watch. It is a documentary and therefore, the actors who appear in the film are not celebrities, but are actually ordinary people, that gave their lives to make this film. I hope you enjoy this film as much as I did. To me, it is a very inspiring film, and I can recommend it to all people who like documentaries, to see this film and to share it with others. My rating: 7/10.

Monday, 27 Apr 2020 03:32

As always a quality documentary and that's what this documentary is about. I watched it today and even though it was well done, I felt it was overrated by some people. I watched the documentary a few days ago and I feel I got much more out of it than I did before. The main issue for me was that I didn't feel it was one of those documentaries that were just there to hold your attention. This documentary is about the importance of the past, even though it's not from the perspective of the present, because its about how the past affects you. It shows the impact of the First World War in Germany, about the way the war affected German people, about the effect of it on the women in the camp. It shows how the camp was made, the way the dead were stored and other such things. The movie was divided into two parts, the first one about the war and the second one about the camp. The main point that was lacking for me was the timeline. I felt the first part was more important than the second one. The timeline in the second part doesn't really add anything to the story. I didn't feel that it made the story even more powerful and I think the reason why the second part is much more important is because the first one is more meaningful. I feel like this documentary was better than that documentary on History channel about Al Qaeda because the documentary that the History channel showed was quite misleading and inaccurate. Overall, a great documentary and I recommend it.

See all 21 reviews

Write a review